To President Trump
2019-10-08: Dear Sir,
Violation of the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4 is not a “criminal penalty”.
I told "my lawyer" that the "reason for crime" in the "indictment" was wrong.
But the lawyer says, "It's no use saying the logic of the procedure."
You should “open” Japanese “lawyer services” to foreigners.
Part 1. Prosecutors arrested Filipinos for "unqualified labor".
He performed "crime" to make the Philippine "Imprisonment". (Usually a small fine).
To do so, he must comply with international law.
“I pretended” to dispose of “equality under the law”.
He “disguised” a “supporter”
who violated Article 70 of the Immigration Act so as not to violate international law.
This impersonation is important.
Acts that support Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act cannot be punished
because they are administrative measures.
So, it was disguised with the following scenario.
1) Philippine people
who worked illegally received “provided” “false fake employment contracts” from “supporters”.
2) So the Philippines were able to obtain a status of residence.
3) So the Philippines were able to stay in Japan.
4) So the Philippine people were able to do “unqualified work”.
Therefore, the Criminal Code 60 and 62 “Sinners Supporting Other Crimes”
against the Immigration Act Article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes” were applied.
“Criminal trial” is based on “bill of indictment”.
What should be deliberated is "reason for crime".
The criminal reason for “indictment” describes the act of Immigration Act 22-4-4
and the act to support it.
This fact is "administrative disposition" by the Minister of Justice.
Prosecutors, lawyers, and judges do not know this.
This is serious.
Even if you obtain “Resident Status” with “false documents”
(contract documents for false employment), if you work within the scope
of your status of residence, you will not become Article 70 “Unqualified Labor”.
The causal relationship that caused the Philippine people to violate Article 70
of the Immigration Law is because there were employers who hired them illegally.
The employer cannot make an “excuse” that he did not know Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act.
To that end, the July 2010 Immigration Act was amended.
The three-year grace period is over.
A “residence card” system was also introduced to facilitate confirmation.
There is no “excuse” for police officers,
prosecutors, and judges who “did not know the law”.
They do not approve of their crimes.
They need "extreme penalty".
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
2) Criminal law
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds
of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
My information ********
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!