To President Trump
2019-10-10: Dear Sir,
I explain to the "Advisor Lawyer" of the "Democratic Party" "This case is an error
in the law that applies." The lawyer says, show me Article 64 of the Penal Code,
and “the principal offense” is “the punishment of labor”,
so Articles 60 and 62 are “legal”. This is not the “answer”. Crazy.
This political party “opposed” to “legislation” of “conspiracy to commit”.
Japanese human rights cannot be protected unless Lawyer services are open to foreign lawyers.
Part 1. This is a criminal fact of Article 172 "Criticism
of False False" committed by a prosecutor of trial.
This description is omitted.
Police officers and prosecutors commit the following crimes:
1) “Indictment” with false “Sin name”.
This is Article 172 of the Criminal Code, “Sentence of False False Constitution”.
The reason was explained the day before.
2) Arrests and confines anything innocent and conducts "investigation" and "trial".
This is the “crime of abuse of authority by special civil servants”
in Article 194 of the Penal Code.
I explained this as well the day before.
See below for details of the law. (Japanese and English translation)
Please refer to the following Wikipedia for Article 172 of the Penal Code "Sin
of false accusation".
Please refer to the following Wikipedia for the Criminal Code Article 194 “Sinence
of Abuse of Official Rights by Special Officials”.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%85%AC%E5%8B%99%E5%93%A1%E8%81%B7%E6%A8%A9%E6%BF%AB%E7 % 94% A8% E7% BD% AA
Crime is a fact.
But they protect their peers.
And they “smash” “accusation”. *
They are continuing crime.
The same goes for the Diet members.
It seems that they understood "crime" by daily email.
Some parliamentarians “disturb” “outgoing mail” with “anonymous” email addresses.
The same applies to Japanese media.
They won't be able to "excuse".
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
2) Criminal law
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
My information ********
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!