To President Trump
2019-10-11: Dear Sir,
There are “National Diet members” who “hindrance” the “National Rights”.
He says "Don't send this email!" I think "He wants to crush this incident".
It becomes a hint of "Japanese politics".
“Repression of human rights” by politicians is unacceptable.
Publish your email address. Investigate by your hand and publish this "name of legislator"
and "affiliation party" in the media.
Part 1. I think he still gets a free email address today.
If you don't need email, you can reply to email or
You should request "cancel mail delivery" with "email address".
Until now, there has been no request for “stop distribution” from the Diet members.
However, there is a request for "change email address" of the destination.
There were two “mail stop requests” from the embassy by “mail or telephone”.
I received a phone call for encouragement.
We received two emails requesting “unsubscribe” from the US media.
I received several "requests to change my email address" emails.
I received a lot of “encouragement emails”.
I need more time to make an article, sorry.
I ’m looking forward to receiving “daily email”.
I deliver many emails every day.
And I receive many emails.
I might accidentally delete received email
So I write three email addresses in the email.
You can always receive an email requesting “cancel email delivery”.
Anonymous email information.
"Sender's email address"
I will send you all the header information for this email.
Check the truth with your hands.
Please publish this "name of the legislator" and "affiliated political party" with your hands.
Or contact me.
This is an important “news tip” for learning the skills of Japanese politicians.
I know the answer of this “Parliamentarian”.
"I don't do it."
"What the secretary did without permission"
"This is the secretary's responsibility."
Now, everyone! Check out the “Japanese politician comedy show”.
Continue to next week.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
2) Criminal law
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
My information ********
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!