Japan's Justice in the Dark

Please support so that Japan will be governed under the law, fundamental human rights will be protected, and it will become a country complying with international law

Nagano Opinion To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-10-15: Dear S Lawyers are obedient to “illegal acts” of prosecutors and judges. The media collaborated with the police to “report false” and “support” their “crimes”.

To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister


2019-10-15: Dear Sir,
In cases of violation of immigration law, police officers, prosecutors and many judges conspire to “violate” the “applicable laws”. Lawyers are obedient to “illegal acts” of prosecutors and judges. The media collaborated with the police to “report false” and “support” their “crimes”. Before the war in Japan, it was “national socialism”. Japan has returned to the same “national socialism” era as the “Nazi Party”. The international community should “warn” Japan.


Part 1. The following is the fact of the charges against the judge.
(It is a criminal fact of the abuse of special civil servant's right
of judge who issued an arrest warrant.)
Around June 2014, Filipinos were working
in non-qualified activities at a landscaping company in Tokyo.
The punishment for this fact is
1) Philippine people are guilty of immigration law Article 70 (unqualified labor).
2) The landscaping company is Article 72-2 of the Immigration Control Act
(a crime that promotes illegal labor).
There is no excuse for not knowing Article 72-2 in the 2010 Immigration Control Amendment.
The three-year grace period for implementing this law has ended.
For this purpose, a “resident status card” system was introduced.

The landscaping company hired the Philippines illegally.
(There is no excuse.)
Police do not arrest landscaping companies under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

However, the police and the prosecutor have “focused on” that the Filipinos acted
under the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4 “Disposal of Status of Residence”.
Originally, it should be “reported” to the Minister
of Justice, but they came up with an exploit.
Therefore, the following scenario was devised.
1) The Philippine people were provided with a “lie fake employment contract”
by the “Philippine Embassy staff driver”.
2) So the Philippines were able to obtain “resident status”.
3) So the Philippines were able to live in Japan.
4) So the Philippine people were able to work illegally.
So police and prosecutors “use” the embassy staff (drivers)
who “provided” “false employment contracts” to the Filipinos.

Embassy staff (drivers) are “supporters” in Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law.
The embassy staff (driver) should also “report” to the Minister of Justice.
However, police and the prosecution “misapply misused” without “reporting”.
The “supporter” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act has been replaced
with the “supporter” in Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The police then made a “request for arrest” against the “court” with a false “sin name”.

The judge did not point out violations of the “applicable law”.
The judge made a “special profit calculation”.
And the judge illegally issued an “arrest warrant”.
Police officers "squeezed" "freedom of decision-making" of "embassies officials"
by "arrest warrant".
He “Arrested and confined” the “Embassy staff”.
The judge wanted to get “achievements” as a judge
by “piggybacking” to police officers who wanted to get “achievements”.
This is an “organized crime”.
So the police performed “information manipulation” using the media.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds
of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp