2019-10-23: Dear Sir,
The Japanese Diet made a fuss about the “legislation” of “conspiracy charges, charges of conspiracy”. However, “Crime of assistance” is ignored.
The act of “supporting” the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4, which is “administrative disposition”, was punished by the Criminal Code Articles 60 and 62 “Sinners Supporting Other Crimes”. Next, "you who come to Japan" will also be "criminals". waiting.
Part 1. Explains malicious and deliberate criminal acts.
According to the Supreme Court's “Judgment example”,
Article 194 of the Criminal Code of “Abuse of authority
by special public officer” does not require “proof” of “intentional, purpose”.
If a special civil servant doesn't know the law, he can't follow Article 31 of the Constitution.
To that end, the law has adopted a “system for applying
for a request for an arrest warrant” to a judge.
Write the maliciousness of a special civil servant's crime.
Forcibly link violations of the Immigration Act Article 70 and Immigration Act Article 22-4-4.
In Japan, if the wind blows, it will be profitable.
It's an ill wind that blows nobody any good.
This is a “causal relationship” that forcibly “guides” the “conclusion”.
This is a scenario of “Indictment, bill of indictment ..”.
1) State the fact that the Philippine worked in Article 70 “Out of status of residence”.
This is an act in violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
2) Philippine embassy officials (drivers), etc.
state the fact that they “provided” a “contract document for false employment”
to Filipinos who violated the above-mentioned Immigration Act Article 70.
This is a support act under the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4.
3) Describe the fact that the above-mentioned Filipinos applied for “acquisition”
of “residence status” by attaching “contract documents
of false employment”.
This is an act of Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law.
(As a result, I received “Resident Status” from the Minister of Justice. This is omitted.)
The public prosecutor “punishes” in this scenario.
Philippine embassy officials (drivers and diplomats) are "punished"
for "prisoning imprisonment" in Articles 60 and 62
As mentioned earlier, the act of Article 22-4-4
of the Immigration Control Act is an “administrative disposition”
from the Minister of Justice.
It is not “criminal punishment”.
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
2) Criminal law
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."
Please contact us if you have any questions.