2019-10-31: Dear Sir,
Japanese law is "Sei Grammar, written law". However, "case law" is also regarded as important. There are some cases where “laws” are wrongly applied. It takes time to overthrow the “case” in an actual trial. However, even the Supreme Court case may be overturned. The 2010 Immigration Law violation case is a case of violation of applicable law. However, the prosecution used this “case” to commit the same crime in the 2014 Philippines Embassy case.
Part 1. I was arrested in June 2010.
I was arrested again because I did not confess.
I kept justice in search of "governance under the law". The result was “indicted”.
The trial started in October 2010.
The reason is that the Chinese “Kin Gungaku”,
who was considered “accomplice,” must be sent back to China by the end of October.
I think this secret pledge is set in consideration of the sentencing of immigration law.
From the prosecution, he says that it is necessary to “repatriate”
by the end of October in an agreement with China.
For the first time, I learned that “Immigration Violation Law” had “arrangement”
for “detention period”.
Me and "Kin Gungaku" are responsible for the crime
because they provided a "false employment contract" to four Chinese.
The reason for the crime is the “action” that “supported” the offense
under Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.
On the other hand, many lawyers, parliamentarians and related persons are "no comment".
But foreign government officials and prison officials clearly say
it is a violation of applicable law.
Foreign governments understand Japanese law and international law better than Japanese people.
"Political party officials" who write on the net say the possibility
of following "There are precedents".
However, I think this is the first “violation of immigration law”
that occurred in June 2010.
1) “Inmate imprisonment” applies to foreigners in violation
of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
2) Applying “supporters” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act to “crimes
for supporting other crimes” in Article 60 and 62 of the Penal Code.
The reason for this crime is “support” for the offense
under Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.
Specifically, it is an act of "providing" "false documents = employment contract" to the offender.
This action is used in the “right to investigate facts”.
In the past, the Minister of Justice has never conflicted with the prosecution
in “the right to investigate facts”.
Human rights ministers of justice cannot forgive "human rights violations" against foreigners.
So the prosecution consciously put foreigners in prison instead
of the traditional “fine penalty”.
Furthermore, the “applicable law” was falsified to make the Chinese “punishment”.
Using the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4, which is the discretion
of the Immigration Minister of Justice,
the Criminal Code “Sinners to Support Other Crimes” was applied consciously.
What I discovered after leaving the prison was a violation of the Immigration Law
of the Philippine Embassy.
In this trial process, "our case law" in 2011 was changed to "case law".
Of course, this “illegal case law example” must be “destroyed”.
I think that there are many cases of “illegal case law”
in addition to the Embassy of the Philippines.
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
2) Criminal law
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds of “support
of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I expect no lies.
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."
Please contact us if you have any questions.