To President Trump
2019-11-01: Dear Sir,
After leaving prison, I "sue" police officers, prosecutors, judges, etc. related to the case for a "request for retrial". Prosecutors say "crime fact" is "unknown" in this document. Please judge the facts on the website. How is it in your country? Crazy. This is Japan!
Part 1. Please check the “document exchange record” between the prosecution and me on the web.
According to the law, “sue and accusation” is also possible by “oral, by parol”.
I created a “Claim” and “Clause” and submitted it in “Document”
in order to accurately carry out “Criminal accusation”.
Even if you submit it after correcting it many times, it is the same answer.
I researched and prepared the “criminal composition requirements” of “false charges”
and “special civil servant abuse charges”.
The final documents are available on the web.
If “criminal composition requirements” are unknown,
“advice” should be given and “document preparation” should be “supported”.
The intention of the prosecution was to “crush”.
When the Tokyo Prosecutor's “Prosecutor Prosecutor” (Chief Prosecutor Chief) changed,
I submitted the last document with anticipation.
However, there was no reply.
The “statutory of limitation” for “false charges”
and “special civil servant abuse charges” is 7 years.
Therefore, the “aging statistics of limitation” is over.
However, they refuse to receive “letter of complaint” and “bill of indictment”.
I don't know the “case” in this case.
In this case, I think that the “statistic of limitation” is “stopped” just as
if the criminal had fled abroad.
If the department that receives the “letter of complaint”
or “bill of indictment” refuses to receive it by “authority”,
it is “force majeure” to keep the deadline for submission.
They “rejected” the “receipt” of “letter of complaint”
and “bill of indictment” to “protect” their “mates”.
In the first place, it is “anarchy” when a special civil servant commits a crime
of “false charges” or “special civil servant abuse”.
In addition, we will refuse to receive “indictments”
and “accusal accusations” after repeated crimes.
I will ignore this if I appeal to legislators or political parties who have legislated.
Japan is completely “anarchic”.
This incident is the world's big deal.
In the world, "immigrants" and "refugees" have become major problems.
In the world, "human rights" is a big problem.
Japan is a developed country that should lead human rights.
Japan is the fourth most immigrant country in the world.
The current situation in Japan cannot be solved by “no interference with domestic affairs”.
Governments and international media, everyone!
Please make Japan the right country.
Continue to next week.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
Yasuhiro Nagano
PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I expect no lies.
My information
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
