To President Trump
2019-11-04: Dear Sir,
Please see the "judgment of the trial" of the supporter who "provided" false documents in "obtaining status of residence". In January 2017, the punishment for those who “supported” Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act was “enacted”. Until then, everything is “innocent”. Prosecutors should “self-surrender”.
Part 1. To gain a deeper understanding of immigration laws,
you need to learn case studies in actual cases.
There are articles on tax examinations by tax accountants on charges
of helping to renew their false status of residence.
For details, please see below on July 30, 2019.
https://www.jiji.com/jc/article?k=2019073001002&g=soc
The Metropolitan Police Department's Security Division made a “Send the papers pertaining
to a case to the Public Prosecutors Office” on the 30th for alleged violations
of the Immigration Refugee Law.
Four people were sent, including a tax accountant man (75) in Toshima-ku, Tokyo.
The reason is that they “prepared” a “false statement of accounts, statement”, etc.,
and helped to “renew the status of residence of the Chinese”, all of whom are accused.
According to the same section, the law was amended in January 2017,
and the act of “helping” a “false application” for the status of residence became “illegal”.
As a tax accountant, he was involved in the “false application”
“Exposure” is said to be “first in the whole country”.
In October-December last year,
the tax accountant man instructed the clerk (43) to create a “false report of the trade company”.
Two Chinese women have been charged with violating the Immigration Act.
They “disguised” as if they were running the company.
They are “suspicions” that helped “illegal” renewal of “resident status” of “two people”.
I tried to renew my “resident status” in “Management / Management” to “illegal”.
Please refer to the following for the revised law that applies to those
who have obtained status of residence through false application.
http://www.visa-daiko.com/topics/5297/
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties for those
who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The revised Immigration Control Act was established at the 192nd Extraordinary Diet session
for persons who have obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, school staff, etc.
It is effective from January 1st.
1) I was able to stay in Japan because I was able to obtain a visa with false documents.
2) I was able to work illegally.
3) So the punishment that applies Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code to the provider
of "false documents" is "illegal".
“2010 Kingungaku and I” and “Philippine Embassy and Diplomats from 2014 to 2015” are innocent.
The Chinese government and the Philippine government should ask the Japanese government
for "recovery of honor" and "compensation".
The target person is a “person” who supports the “acquisition of visa status”
of the violator by “providing” “false documents, false documents” to the “violator”
in the “case” of “immigration law violation” is.
Continue to next week.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .
2. The prosecution “applied” the crimes supporting other crimes
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the grounds of “supporting the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4” Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
:::::
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties for those
who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Act was enacted at the 192nd Special Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
:::::
“I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official” is 100% “innocent”.
“Reference”: A foreigner performed an act prescribed
in the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4 (Acquisition of status of residence
by submitting false documents). However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The prosecution is “crush something in one's hand”.
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop”
of “aging, statistics of limitations”.
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.
Yasuhiro Nagano
My information
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
