To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister
2019-11-08: Dear Sir,
In January 2017, the punishment for those who “supported” Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act was “enacted”. Until then, everything is “innocent”. This completely innocences me and the Chinese, KinGungaku and “Philippine embassy officials and diplomats”. It should be discussed immediately in the Diet. Prosecutors should “self-surrender”.
Part 1. Mainichi Shimbun August 28, 2019, the LDP “Hiroshi Ueno Welfare Labor,
Parliamentary Secretary” received “suspicion report”.
He “spoken” to the Ministry of Justice in relation to foreign workers.
In return, he requested money from a temporary staffing agency in Tokyo.
With this “report”, Ueno offered to “resign”.
The government decided at the “Cabinet” of the “carrying” on the 28th.
This is the end of the incident.
So the truth of immigration violation cases is that “darkness” is “deep”.
The judiciary and the parliamentarians are temporarily in trouble,
but conspire to “be buried in the darkness”.
Parliamentarians should understand immigration laws and rescue many victims around the world.
Just like the judge of the previous day, illegal judicial administration should be corrected
by Article 31 and Article 14 of the Constitution.
It is illegal to apply criminal aid assistance for reasons of support
under Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Act for violations of Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
Please see the "judgment of the trial" of the supporter who "provided" false documents
in "obtaining status of residence".
Previously, under the Immigration Control Act, “persons who acquired status
of residence” through “false application” were not subject to penal regulations
(Article 70, Article 74-6).
The "Revised Immigration Act" is subject to penal provisions
for those who have obtained a "residence status" through a "false application",
as well as applications such as workplaces, lawyers, administrative scriveners,
and school staff that have helped them. It was established at the Diet.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
Citizens and victims are watching the “Monkey Play” of Japanese parliamentarians.
Immediately, “Restoration of Honor” and “Compensation” for “I and Kingungaku”
and “Philippine embassy officials and diplomats” should be performed.
100% innocent. The minutes of the Diet are proof.
Continue to next week.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality
under the Law” of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .
2. The prosecution “applied” the crimes supporting other crimes
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the grounds of “supporting the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4” Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
:::::
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties
for those who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Act was enacted
at the 192nd Special Diet session for those who obtained status
of residence through falsification applications, office workers who helped them,
lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
:::::
“I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official” is 100% “innocent”.
“Reference”: A foreigner performed an act prescribed
in the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4 (Acquisition of status of residence
by submitting false documents). However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The prosecution is “crush something in one's hand”.
However, “crush something in one's hand”
by the state power is “stop” of “aging, statistics of limitations”.
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.
Yasuhiro Nagano
PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I expect no lies.
Yasuhiro Nagano
It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/
Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
