Japan's Justice in the Dark

Please support so that Japan will be governed under the law, fundamental human rights will be protected, and it will become a country complying with international law

Nagano Opinion To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-11-11: Dear Sir, Governments and media in each country should conduct “investigation of victims in each country”. "Persons" who hav

To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister

2019-11-11: Dear Sir,
Governments and media in each country should conduct “investigation of victims in each country”. "Persons" who have been "punished" by working in "labor outside of resident status" in Japan, and "persons who have been punished" for issuing "false documents" to foreigners are "innocent". Many foreigners are victims. Of course, I keep sending this email to Abe's official residence every day.

Part 1. I “sue” the Japanese government's illegal “punishment for violation of immigration law”.
I sued two violations.
1) Foreigners disposed of in violation of Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act are not guilty because they violate "Equality
under the Law" of Article 14 of the Constitution.
2) Those who have been criminally punishable for delivering false documents are completely innocent.
The Japanese government should “punish” “judicial officials”.

I am fighting not only for me, but also for the Chinese, the Filippins,
and the many victims of the world.
In 2010, “Chinese and I” were punished.
The same problem occurred because the Chinese government did not protest this illegal punishment.
In 2014 and 2015, it occurred at the Embassy of the Philippines.
This is exactly the same as the 2010 “case”.

There are many other “illegal punishments”, but I do n’t have “detailed information”.
But I think there are countless "similar violations".

One is when a foreigner does "work other than resident status" in Japan.
“Illegal labor” is not “established” by foreigners alone.
This is because there are “employers” who employ “foreigners who work illegally”.
Therefore, the Immigration Law punishes with a clear causal relationship.
Foreigners will be punished under Article 70 of the Immigration Law.
Employers will be punished under Article 72-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
However, only foreigners are punishable and employers are not punishable. There is a problem here.
This violates Article 14 “Equality under the Law” of the Japanese Constitution.
Therefore, if the employer is innocent, the foreigner is also innocent.

The second is to provide “false documents” to foreigners and to obtain “resident status”
(in violation of Immigration 22-4-4).
However, this action cannot be punished by Article 31 “Governance under the Law”.
“Criminal disposition” is not possible for “Administrative Disposition”
by the Minister of Justice.
In Japan, “Arrest and confinement” and punishment are possible only under “law”.

The prosecution dismisses this as "only you" logic, but this is not "only me" logic.
In January 2017, the act was “enforced” to “punish” this act because it cannot be punished.
You cannot punish retroactively according to Article 39 of the Constitution.
“Me and Chinese kinGungaku” and “Philippine embassy officials and diplomats” are 100% innocent.

Many Chinese are visiting Japan.
Therefore, “many Chinese” are “victims”.
The Chinese government has begun investigating the victims of the incident I point out.
National governments should also start investigating victims.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
2) Criminal law
Penal code
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan

Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .

2. The prosecution “applied” the crimes that support other crimes in Article 60
and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act on the grounds
of “support of Article 22-4-4” Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties
for those who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Act was enacted at the 192nd Special Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".

“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.

The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop”
of “aging, statistics of limitations”.

The materials are below.

There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.

Yasuhiro Nagano

It is open to the program below.

Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.