Japan's Justice in the Dark

Please support so that Japan will be governed under the law, fundamental human rights will be protected, and it will become a country complying with international law

Nagano Opinion To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-11-12: “My country is supported by the Japanese government,” so I can't tell the Japanese government, but I personally tell international organizations. First, "big countrie

To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister


2019-11-12: Dear Sir,
“A ambassador of a country” told me. “My country is supported by the Japanese government,” so I can't tell the Japanese government, but I personally tell international organizations. First, "big countries such as China and the United States" should "request" the Japanese government. Of course, I keep sending this email to Abe's official residence every day.


Part 1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But if the employer is innocent, the foreigner is innocent.

Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
In contrast, the Immigration Act punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act
(a crime that promotes illegal employment), but does not punish them.

Prosecutors have “discretionary power”.
However, punishment of causal “one side only” violates Article 14 “Equality under the Law”.

The prosecution will not dispose of the employer as having no “intentional” reason
because the employer did not know the law in Article 72-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
If this is the case, foreigners cannot be “disposed”.

Therefore, in July 2010, Article 72-2 of the Immigration Control Act was amended.
The law states that “you cannot escape the punishment because you do not know the law”.
It's a strange law.
Moreover, there was a three-year “grace period”.

However, officials from the Embassy of the Philippines were punished
for “violating the Immigration Act”.
“Philippines with Specified Visa” were arrested for violating Article 70
of the Immigration Act while working at “landscaping stores” other than “Specified Visa”.
However, “Landscaping” will not be punished.

This incident occurred from 2014 to 2015.
You should punish “landscaping” that you hired illegally.
If you don't punish the "landscaping shop", the "Philippines" are "innocent".
This violates Article 14 of the “Constitution of Japan”.

This also violates the International Convention on Human Rights because it
only punishes foreigners.
The Japanese government has made the foreign government “stupid”
as “foreign government does not know Japanese law”.
There was a bigger reason. (This is the first sentence.)

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .

2. The prosecution “applied” the crimes that support other crimes
in Article 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the grounds of “support of Article 22-4-4” Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
:::::
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties
for those who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Act was enacted at the 192nd Special Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
:::::
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".

“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes” in Articles 60 and 62
of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.

The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop”
of “aging, statistics of limitations”.
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.


Yasuhiro Nagano


PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I expect no lies.

Yasuhiro Nagano


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp