2019-11-14: Dear Sir,
The “Immigration Case Violation Case” in which I have filed “accuse” and “accuse” is extremely vicious. The Chinese government and the Philippine government should claim the "recovery of honor" and "compensation" for "I and the Chinese and the Philippine". Naturally, you should also claim for "other victims". Of course, I keep sending this email to Abe's official residence every day.
Part 1. The prosecution punishes violators of the "Immigration Act Article 70"
but does not punish violators of the "Immigration Act Article 73-2" hiring foreigners,
knowing that it cannot be punished by the July 2010 Immigration Control Amendment .
Not only that, but those who have nothing to do with the violation
of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act were punished.
It punished us under “Articles 60 and 62” for “reason”
for “providing” false documents described in the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4.
Stakeholders should be criminalized.
“Conventional” means that foreigners
who have made Article 70 “Labor outside the status of residence”
in the Immigration Control Law have been “punishment” and “exiled”.
However, in this case, foreigners who did “unqualified labor”
under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act were sentenced to “punishment for imprisonment”.
This difference in “punishment” clearly violates Article 14 “Equality under the Law”
I would violate Article 14 “Equality under the Law” even to make foreigners
who “worked outside of the status of residence”
in violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Law “punishment of fines”
without penalizing employers think.
"Fine punishment" is also a criminal measure.
This is what the police officers and prosecutors said (MISESIME) "show them to others" and "punish".
I am consciously punished.
They told me.
“You should admit“ crime ”in“ general theory ”.
This word speaks everything.
Article 31 “Constitution under the Law” does not exist.
They were “hostile” to the Chinese government.
I think they had “hostility” in the Philippine government.
The Chinese and Philippine governments should demand strict punishment from the Japanese government.
Of course, the US government should also request the Japanese government to punish
those involved for “illegal punishment”.
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
2) Criminal law
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .
2. The prosecution “applied” the crimes that support other crimes
in Article 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the grounds of “support of Article 22-4-4” Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties
for those who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Act was enacted at the 192nd Special Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".
“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed
out by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop” of “aging,
statistics of limitations”.
The materials are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.
Please contact us if you have any questions.