To President Trump
2019-11-27: Dear Sir,
“New York Times and other media” have criticized the Japanese justice system several times. Unless the Japanese justice system is improved, it is dangerous for Western businessmen to work in Japan. Please make my “incidents of immigration law violations” “feature articles.” Today is “Bail”. "I was released on bail more than a year after the arrest."
Part 1. In the New York Times February 22 editorial:
The title is "Mr. Ghosn" is "relative" to "Japanese justice".
While Ghosn's accused is “serious”, it is “not a reason to refuse bail”.
You should question the current situation in which he is “detained”
in “detention center” even after three months from his arrest.
In Japan, he points out that “bail” is generally for defendants who are “trial”
and “ready to convict”.
Ghosn ’s “bail request” has been repeatedly “rejected”
Ghosn ’s “innocent claim” is the “reason”.
I don't know when "trial" will be, but it's not just "legendary managers" who are judged.
The editorial concludes that “the Japanese justice system” should also be “judged”.
I think it's a great editorial!
I was arrested on June 14, 2010.
A “judgment” came out in late April 2011.
Penalized for one and a half years (execution), fine 500,000 yen.
On June 24, 2011, I was "bailed" by the Tokyo High Court Judge.
I applied for “bail” every month.
However, it is “rejection” every time.
The reason for the rejection is “criminal”
for “defendant” even if “scrutinize” the “trial materials” such as bill of indictment.
The revised Immigration Control Act implemented in January 2017 proves "innocent".
Since the act of “delivering” “false documents” cannot be “punished”,
a law to “punish” shall be enacted.
I think you can understand that Japanese judges are "inspecting meaninglessly".
If you compare "Indictment, bill of indictment" and "Immigration Law Article 22-4-4",
you are immediately acquitted.
Nothing will be “examined”. Crazy.
Foreign media say his "detention" is long, but I think Carlos Ghosn's "bail" was early.
This was because foreign media was “noisy” and had to be “bailed”.
Please feature the crime situations of Japanese police officers, prosecutors,
judges, lawyers, and media in the “Immigration Control Violation Case”.
The "supporters" who received my email say there is no "power" to protest the Japanese government,
but "they" say they want to be "power".
If so, please consider one of the following as a method of support.
1) “Sign” the “Protest against the Japanese Government”.
2) Please recruit "donations to me" in the media and organizations.
“The number of donors” and “funded amount” are the power
of protest against the Japanese government.
3) Please boycott Japanese products.
The Japanese say "others' misfortune tastes honey".
Japanese people cannot understand “governance under the law” unless they become “unhappy”.
Please email me for details.
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under the Immigration Act Article 73-2
(a crime that promotes illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .
2. The prosecution “applied” the crimes supporting other crimes
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the grounds of “supporting the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4” Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
:::::
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties
for those who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Act was enacted at the 192nd Special Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
:::::
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".
“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop”
of “aging, statistics of limitations”.
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.
Yasuhiro Nagano
https://www.facebook.com/PRCXi/?eid=ARBmHE4v8AA7yxU-5ZM1CUROKZrbwQwUp-XQtG_Yc35LVpd1Hw1O4RYHRxSpVkw63HbzN0Qzbnpgfl0v#
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
