To President Trump
2019-11-28: Dear Sir,
“New York Times and other media” have criticized the Japanese justice system several times. Unless the Japanese justice system is improved, it is dangerous for Western businessmen to work in Japan. Please make my “incidents of immigration law violations” “feature articles.” Today is “illegal arrest”. “My proof of innocence is the reason for the revision of the Immigration Act in January 2017.” The legislature legislated that “providing false documents is not guilty, so make it a crime”.
Part 1. “Prosecution” consciously “arrests” based on “a certain idea”.
In the case of Carlos Ghosn, “Nissan Motors in Japan” is “not wanted to be taken” by France.
In my case, it is “hate” against Chinese who come to Japan and earn illegally.
It is usually “small penalty” and “move out”.
The administration at that time was "Democratic Party".
The Democratic Party “Minister of Justice Chiba” issued a “Notification”
that refuses to accompany police officers when exercising the “right to investigate facts” held
by immigration officials.
This made it difficult to investigate “Chinese illegal labor”.
Therefore, it was made "punishment for imprisonment" for "punishment"
for "Chinese who violated Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act".
Employers must be punished according to Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
in order to make them “punishment for imprisonment”.
However, the prosecution does not want to punish because the employer is Japanese.
That's why I “looked” at “I” who hired “hate Chinese”.
My criminal reason was providing "false documents" to the Chinese.
Since this Immigration Act Article 22-4-4 is an "administrative disposition"
by the Minister of Justice, no punishment is possible.
My arrest was on June 14, 2010.
However, from July 1, 2010, foreigners who “provided” “false documents” as a result
of amendments to the Immigration Control Law have been treated the same as “foreigners
who have acquired residence status”.
In other words, they knew that they could not be punished.
However, he arrested "I and Chinese KinGungaku" for providing "false documents."
This is a calculated crime.
Usually, even if they are arrested, everyone “acknowledges sin”.
The prosecution's "calculation error" is in "I did not admit the crime".
Police officers, prosecutors, and judges ran “scenarios” to “crimes”.
Please feature the crime situations of Japanese police officers, prosecutors,
judges, lawyers, and media in the “Immigration Control Violation Case”.
The "supporters" who received my email say there is no "power" to protest the Japanese government,
but "they" say they want to be "power".
If so, please consider one of the following as a method of support.
1) “Sign” the “Protest against the Japanese Government”.
2) Please recruit "donations to me" in the media and organizations.
“The number of donors” and “funded amount” are the power
of protest against the Japanese government.
3) Please boycott Japanese products.
The Japanese say "others' misfortune tastes honey".
Japanese people cannot understand “governance under the law” unless they become “unhappy”.
Please email me for details.
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
2) Criminal law
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under the Immigration Act Article 73-2 (a crime that promotes illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .
2. The prosecution “applied” the crimes supporting other crimes in Articles 60
and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act on the grounds
of “supporting the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4” Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties for those
who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Act was enacted at the 192nd Special Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".
“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop”
of “aging, statistics of limitations”.
The materials are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!