Japan's Justice in the Dark

Please support so that Japan will be governed under the law, fundamental human rights will be protected, and it will become a country complying with international law

Nagano Opinion To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-11-29: Dear Sir, “New York Times and other media” have criticized the Japanese justice system several

To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister

2019-11-29: Dear Sir,
New York Times and other media” have criticized the Japanese justice system several times. Unless the Japanese justice system is improved, it is dangerous for Western businessmen to work in Japan. Please make my “incidents of immigration law violations” “feature articles.” Today, “There are no lawyers in Japan who understand the law.” I explained to the lawyer why I was not guilty, but the lawyer did not understand.

Part 1. Many people understand the maliciousness of this incident because they email every day.
“Me and Chinese KinGungaku” and “Philippine embassy officials
and diplomats” were punished under “Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code”
because they provided “false documents” to those who violated the Immigration Act Article 70 received.
According to Article 31 of the Constitution, no one is subject to any arrest,
detention or punishment that is not based on law.
However, this act is not a crime because it is an act of "supporting" Article 22-4-4
of the Immigration Control Act.
The act of obtaining "Residence Status" from "false documents" is clearly stated
in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act as administrative disposition by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code cannot be applied to support actions
that are not crimes.

I told this about my lawyer.
(Because it is imprisoned in custody, no specific “clause” in the Immigration Act is mentioned.)
However, the lawyer said, "It doesn't make sense to say procedural theory."
When I asked a lawyer for "insertion" of the "Immigration Law", a "Ministerial Ordinance" arrived.
In the “Basic Rules for the Attorney's Duties”,
“A defense attorney” states the duty to examine the law.
The fact that lawyers do not investigate the law makes it possible for prosecutors to commit crimes.

After leaving the prison, I consulted with a Communist Party lawyer for a “request for retrial”.
She said.
“The prosecution can change the law that the indictment applies to.”
However, this case is a “confirmed case”.
I thought it would be meaningless to talk to this lawyer.

I also consulted with a counsel at the “former Democratic Party” (currently?).
In advance, I had provided all materials to him via a city councilor.
I was expecting an answer from the lawyer to “Error in applicable law”.
He said.
According to Article 64 of the Penal Code, “Chinese” is a “work punishment”,
so the application of Article 60 and Article 62 is “correct”.
(This is an answer for "Kid Childhood").
Reference: Article 64 of the Penal Code.
If the “positive offender” is “detained” or “fees, fine”,
it means a clause that “exempts” the punishment of “instigation, instigation” or “assistance”.

This “lawyer” opposed the “establishment” of “conspiracy”.
A political party with an attorney who can not understand even the "logic
of law" can not be discussed in the Diet.

Please feature the crime situations of Japanese police officers, prosecutors, judges,
lawyers, and media in the “Immigration Control Violation Case”.
The "supporters" who received my email say there is no "power" to protest the Japanese government,
but "they" say they want to be "power".
If so, please consider one of the following as a method of support.
1) “Sign” the “Protest against the Japanese Government”.
2) Please recruit "donations to me" in the media and organizations.
“The number of donors” and “funded amount” are the power of protest
against the Japanese government.
3) Please boycott Japanese products.
The Japanese say "others' misfortune tastes honey".
Japanese people cannot understand “governance under the law” unless they become “unhappy”.
Please email me for details.

Continue to next week.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
2) Criminal law
Penal code
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan

Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under the Immigration Act Article 73-2
(a crime that promotes illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .

2. The prosecution “applied” the crimes supporting other crimes
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the grounds of “supporting the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4” Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties
for those who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Act was enacted at the 192nd Special Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".

“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.

The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop”
of “aging, statistics of limitations”.

The materials are below.

There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.

Yasuhiro Nagano

It is open to the program below.

Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.