2019-12-10: Dear Sir,
Suppose a Chinese or Philippine person has “attached” a “false document” and obtained a “resident status”. However, they do not violate Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act if they work within the scope of “Resident Status”. There is no "causal relationship" between violation of the Immigration Act Article 70 and "supporting act" (providing false documents) in the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4. Many agree with my claim. But the prosecution still does not approve.
Part 1. The correctness of my claim is proved by the revised Immigration Control Act
that was "constructed" from January 2017.
November 18, 2016, in the first 192 times extraordinary session "Act
for Partial Revision of the Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act" is established,
has been promulgated in the same month 28 days.
A new status of residence for "nursing care" has been established (enforced on September 1, 2017).
Another important point is that in recent years,
measures and penalties have been strengthened, such as “disguised” “stayers”,
which have become a problem.
In recent years, there has been an increasing problem of fraudulent graduation certificates,
employment contracts, etc., fraudulently obtaining a status of residence
or disappearing from the place of training, and working illegally elsewhere.
Please see “Part 2” below for details of the revision.
"We have legislated legislation to punish the person who provided the false document"
I also talked to "My Lawyer" about Article 22-4-4 "Provision of False Documents".
Then the lawyer says:
"Your logic is procedural theory."
“There is no“ meaning ”to say procedural theory.”
I wanted to change my lawyer.
However, the suspect has been “arrested and confined”.
The suspect is “detained” and cannot even “find” a new “lawyer”.
This is the “hostage justice system”, which is a characteristic
of the “judicial system” in Japan.
The police officer says.
“You should admit your sin in the“ general theory ””.
They define crime by "general theory" rather than by law.
The prosecutor says.
"Who do you believe in what you say?"
Certainly, many Japanese did not believe me.
Many Japanese people enjoy that “the misfortune of others tastes like honey”.
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
2) Criminal law
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .
2. The prosecution applied “applying” the crimes supporting other crimes
in Article 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4”.
Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties for those
who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The revised Immigration Control Law was enacted at the 192nd Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".
“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop”
of “aging, statistics of limitations”.
The materials are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue. I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.
Please e-mail if the URL of the document web is as shown below. (Return a private URL).
Please contact us if you have any questions.