Japan's Justice in the Dark

Please support so that Japan will be governed under the law, fundamental human rights will be protected, and it will become a country complying with international law

Nagano Opinion To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-12-23: Dear Sir, As a result of the media's “December Survey”, the common question is the “Meeting of

To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister


2019-12-23: Dear Sir,
As a result of the media's “December Survey”, the common question is the “Meeting of Cherry Blossoms” issue, with nearly 60% of voices saying that Prime Minister Abe needs to explain further in the Diet. That is. However, the approval rate of opposition parties pursuing this issue has not increased. Even if there is that much "situation proof", the opposition party cannot make a "criminal complaint". It seems to have disappointed the people. There seems to be no politician in Japan who can rule Japan under the law.


Part 1. In the national opinion survey conducted by the Yomiuri Shimbun on the 13th to 15th,
the Abe Cabinet's approval rating was 48%,
almost unchanged from the previous survey of 49% on the 15th to 17th November.
The unsupported rate increased by 4 points to 40% (36% last time).
Political party support rates are in the order of LDP 37% (previous 37%),
Constitutional Democratic Party 6% (7%).
The non-partisan group was 44% (38%).

According to an ANN poll, the Abe Cabinet's approval rating was 40.9%, down 3.5 points
from last month's survey. On the other hand, 40.6% of respondents answered
that they do not support the Abe Cabinet, an increase of 6.3 points.
As for whether or not Prime Minister Abe needs to explain further
about the problem related to the cherry blossom viewing party,
59% answered “I think it is necessary” and exceeded 33% of “I don't think” It was.

Prime Minister Abe ’s illegal “proof of the situation” comes out.
“Illegal issue” of “The Cherry Blossom Viewing Party”.
"Advertising tower" of Japan Life.
“Anti-social organization (mafia)” and “intimate relationship”.
The “opposition party” does not make “criminal accusations”. *
The public is frustrated.
The public cannot support the Abe Cabinet.
But the public cannot support even the opposition party.
In the end, it just increased the “non-partisan group”.

If it is Korea, it is a “candle demo” perfectly.
Even in Hong Kong, I think there is an “anti-government demonstration” like this now.
In the United States, it ’s a “impeachment trial”.
In France, a “revolution” occurs.

The Japanese spend "silence".
This is "proof that Japan is not governed by law."

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality
under the Law” of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .

2. The prosecution applied “applying” the crimes supporting other crimes
in Article 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4”.
Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
:::::
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties
for those who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The revised Immigration Control Law was enacted at the 192nd Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
:::::
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".

“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.

The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop”
of “aging, statistics of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.

Please e-mail if the URL of the document web is as shown below. (Return a private URL).
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Yasuhiro Nagano


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/

Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

障がい者がつくったお弁当を買ってあげてください! お電話してあげてください。紹介してください。
http://tomonisango.blog.jp/archives/cat_306084.html
★「他人の不幸は蜜の味」「愛は世界の民を救う」 詳しくは、
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/