To President Trump
2019-12-25: Dear Sir,
American media is crazy. President Trump is “not bad”. Don't change the story. Proof of suspicion of Biden parent and child is first. The American Democratic Party and the media are more crazy than the Japanese LDP and the media. The media should seriously discuss "Ukrainian issues" more seriously than "Ukrainian alleged suspicion".
Part 1,
December 16, 2019 "Current affairs dot com news" reports.
The US newspapers are "publishing" the following "editorials" one after another
in response to US President Trump's "Ukrainian uspicion".
Trump should be "impeached impeachment".
You should “prosecution” Mr. Trump.
You should “dismissal” Trump.
Ahead of the “voting” for the “proposed prosecution” at the main session of the US House
By the 15th, the number of “10 newspapers” was exceeded.
The New York Times is an editorial on the 14th, with a headline of just one word, “Impeach”.
Demanded “immunition impeachment” and “dismissal”.
About the "prosecution of impeachment" passed by the House Judiciary Committee,
“The story told is short, simple and outrageous,” accusing Trump of abuse of power.
Local newspaper Tampa Bay Times (Florida) also published an editorial on the 13th.
As a result of a thorough analysis of the House Impeachment Survey,
“Unfortunately, I have to say that there is enough evidence to justify Trump's impeachment.
Each newspaper company seems to be a Democratic Party magazine.
It seems to be a Japanese judge who thinks that the conclusion comes first.
What you do first is to calmly prove that the crime of "Biden's parents and children" is innocent. "
I am interested in the article “NewsWeek” on December 9, 2019.
What is the more serious “Ukraine issue” than “Trump's Ukraine Suspicion”?
Tatiana Stanovaya (Researcher, Moscow Center, Carnegie International Peace Foundation)
The Japanese site is below.
https://www.newsweekjapan.jp/stories/world/2019/12/post-13562_1.php
The turmoil of US President Trump that has been triggered
by the so-called Ukrainian suspicion has been a big news every day,
but the geopolitical point is the other “Ukraine problem”.
Americans should be “aware”.
The US security issue is not "Ukrainian alleged Suspicion".
The US security issue is the “Ukraine issue”.
But in "Ukrainian alleged Suspicion"
The starting point of “Ukrainian Suspicion Suspicion” is “Baiden Parent-Child Problem”.
The US House of Representatives should discuss the “Biden Parents and Children” issue.
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .
2. The prosecution applied “applying” the crimes supporting other crimes
in Article 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4”.
Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
:::::
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties
for those who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The revised Immigration Control Law was enacted at the 192nd Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
:::::
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".
“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop”
of “aging, statistics of limitations”.
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.
Please e-mail if the URL of the document web is as shown below. (Return a private URL).
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
Yasuhiro Nagano
My information
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
