2010-01-09: Dear Sirs,
"The sea level is expected to rise about 7 meters in the future," the IPCC says. I think we are about 10 centimeters. The "logic" of the IPCC is crazy. It is the same as the logic of a Japanese judge. Governments and the media should scrutinize this difference.
Part 1. I will republish the Sunday edition of January 5, 2020 again.
Global warming melts the Arctic ice and raises sea levels, creating many submerged areas in coastal areas.
That was said, but this is not true.
Archimedes (Archimedes: B.C.287-212) principle "underwater objects become lighter
by the weight of the water they displaced."
When the ice floating on the water melts, the water volume does not change even if the ice melts,
because the volume increase of the water is equal to the volume decrease of the submerged ice.
Wikipedia's "Archimedes's Principle" explains this with simple mathematical formulas,
so if you are interested, please take a look.
(Japanese) URL is below.
The main cause of sea level rise due to the effects of global warming is thermal expansion of seawater.
Since the volumetric expansion coefficient of water is about 2.1x10-4 / ° C,
if the temperature rises by 10 ° C and the amount of sea level rise is calculated,
the average seabed depth of the entire earth is about 3,700 m.
3,700 x 10 x 2.1x10-4 = 7.77 (m)
The sea level will rise by more than 7m.
I think this is the "ground" that (IPCC) says.
It is serious. But don't worry.
Although the temperature of the seawater near the sea level rises,
the temperature of the seawater inside hardly changes,
so it is actually expected that the sea level rises at most by about 10 cm.
By the way, the average depth of the Seto Inland Sea is 31m (according to Japan Coast Guard data).
How is it.
The average water depth of the sea floor of the whole earth is about 3,700m, so it is 7m.
Does seawater temperature rise to a depth of 3700m?
I see (IPCC) logic look "crazy".
Don't you think this logic is crazy, Trump?
President Macron, don't you think this logic is crazy?
(IPCC) claims seem to be only a logic to make "CO2" a "bad guy".
It is the same as the logic of the Japanese judge, "If the wind blows, OKYA will make money."
It is a logic that forcibly “leads” to the “conclusion”.
Please see "bill of indictment" で at the "Site" below.
In this case, only by seeing this "bill of indictment", you can understand the "error of applicable law".
Please see the "English translation" and "Japanese original" PDF.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation in English “Indictment letter letter of indictment
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be exact, do it yourself.
● Original Japanese Indictment letter of indictment
`` Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese) ''
The English translation is incorrect. Please see the above "PDF" for English translation.
● Please see the relevant laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
2) Penal code
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
Part 2. I'm "appealing" for two things.
`` Revised on November 4, 2019 ''
I am not only me, but also Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims of the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to solve it by terrorism.
1. Foreigners engaged in "illegal work" other than "status of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law "Illegal labor crimes."
On the other hand, the Immigration Law punishes employees who are "causal"
for illegal work under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Law (crimes for promoting illegal employment).
However, Japanese justice has "punished" only foreigners, but not "employees."
This clearly violates Article 14 of the Japanese Constitution, the principle of equality under the law.
And it violates international law that prohibits "consciously" punishing only foreigners.
If the employer who hired a foreigner illegally is "innocent,"
the foreigner who was illegally worked is also "innocent." .
2. The prosecutor has "applied" Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code "crimes to support other crimes" to Article 70 of the Immigration Law
for the reason of "Support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Law" Wrong with the law. "
"Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law" is the disposition
of a person who has obtained a status of residence by false application.
In the past, the Immigration Control Law did not punish anyone
who obtained a status of residence through a false application (former Articles 70 and 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Control Act was enacted in the 192nd Extraordinary Diet,
which stipulated penalties for those who obtained status of residence due to false applications,
their employers who assisted them, their workplaces, lawyers, administrative scriveners and school staff.
It has been enforced since January 1, 2017.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippines, a Philippine embassy official" is 100% "innocent."
“Reference”: A foreigner has performed an act prescribed
in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law (acquisition of status of residence
by submitting false documents). However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
Dispositions include "cancellation of status of residence" and "forced deportation" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code" Sin to support other crimes "cannot be applied.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act pointed out
by the “Indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law.
The public prosecutor has "squeezed, crush something in one's hand" of the "bill of indictment."
However, "crush something in one's hand" by the state power is "stop" of "statue of statute of limitations".
The materials are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
PS: White House replied to me that she was seriously considering a satisfactory solution to this problem.
I am waiting for the result. I hope that there is no lie.
If the URL of the web of the material is shown below, please email me. (Respond a private URL).
Please contact us if you have any questions.