To President Trump
2020-01-17: Dear Sirs,
"ICC-CPI" is useless. You wouldn't expect "Carlos Ghosn" either. I attribute the "Carlos Ghosn" case to the French government, which planned to make Nissan a Renault subsidiary. French President Macron should do a "judicial transaction" directly with Japanese Prime Minister Abe.
Part 1. This is a matter of the French and Japanese governments.
Carlos Ghosn won't win if there is a causal relationship between nations,
even if he fights with the Japanese government.
I think the Japanese government will escape from the "problem" between nations,
saying it is a private company problem.
If so, I think the French government has no choice but to arrest Nissan officers in France.
However, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) has reported that he intends to be tried in Lebanon,
where a "friendly judicial environment" can be expected for the escape of Carlos Ghosn,
the former chairman of Nissan Motor.
Co-workers say they expect Lebanon's judicial authorities to work
with the Japanese side to move the case to Lebanon.
I think it is difficult.
French President Macron should do a "judicial transaction" directly with Japanese Prime Minister Abe.
If Carlos Ghosn is tried in Japan, he is 99.9% guilty.
In Japan, a "judgment" is decided "before receiving a trial".
The "judgment" is as per the prosecution's "request".
In my case, the reason for the crime
in the indictment is Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.
In other words, it is not clearly a "crime", it is a reason.
Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code cannot be applied to administrative dispositions
of the Minister of Justice.
However, the judge convicted of the argument,
"If the wind blows," Okeya "will make money."
This is not "rule under the law."
I "sue" "innocence" in all means possible in Japan.
But all were rejected.
We appeal to "ICC-CPI" but ignore it.
Some ambassadors from different countries have pointed out that this is clearly a false accusation.
I send this email to Abe's office every day.
But they are ignoring.
We send emails to legislators and political parties every day.
But they ignore the prosecution because they are scared.
If parliamentarians raise this issue in parliament, they will be arrested.
Prosecutors have that power.
Unfortunately, we have a track record.
There is no politician with justice in Japan.
Everyone in the international community watching this email.
I rely on you guys.
Mystery that Guilty's "probability" is 99.9%: do judges,
prosecutors, and lawyers play their part?
——What is the history of criminal justice in Japan and what is the current situation?
Please see "Hakuhou University, Professor Muraoka" and "Hitotsubashi University,
Professor Emeritus Murai" "Talk"
Continue next week.
Please see "bill of indictment" で at the "Site" below.
In this case, only by seeing this "bill of indictment",
you can understand the "error of applicable law".
Please see the "English translation" and "Japanese original" PDF.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation in English “Indictment letter letter of indictment
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be exact, do it yourself.
● Original Japanese Indictment letter of indictment
`` Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese) ''
The English translation is incorrect. Please see the above "PDF" for English translation.
● Please see the relevant laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
2) Penal code
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
Part 2. I'm "appealing" for two things.
`` Revised on November 4, 2019 ''
I am not only me, but also Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims of the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to solve it by terrorism.
1. Foreigners engaged in "illegal work" other than "status of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law "Illegal labor crimes."
On the other hand, the Immigration Law punishes employees who are "causal"
for illegal work under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Law (crimes for promoting illegal employment).
However, Japanese justice has "punished" only foreigners, but not "employees."
This clearly violates Article 14 of the Japanese Constitution, the principle of equality under the law.
And it violates international law that prohibits "consciously" punishing only foreigners.
If the employer who hired a foreigner illegally is "innocent,"
the foreigner who was illegally worked is also "innocent." .
2. The prosecutor has "applied" Article 60 and Article 62
of the Penal Code "crimes to support other crimes" to Article 70 of the Immigration Law
for the reason of "Support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Law" Wrong with the law you do. "
"Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law" is the disposition
of a person who has obtained a status of residence by false application.
In the past, the Immigration Law did not punish anyone who obtained a status
of residence through a false application (former Articles 70 and 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Control Act was enacted in the 192nd Extraordinary Diet,
which stipulated penalties for those who obtained status of residence due to false applications,
their employers who assisted them, their workplaces, lawyers,
administrative scriveners and school staff.
It has been enforced since January 1, 2017.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippines, a Philippine embassy official" is 100% "innocent."
“Reference”: A foreigner has performed an act prescribed in Article 22-4-4
of the Immigration Control Law (acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
Dispositions include "cancellation of status of residence" and "forced deportation"
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code" Sin to support other crimes "cannot be applied.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act pointed out
by the “Indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law.
The public prosecutor has "squeezed, crush something in one's hand" of the "bill of indictment."
However, "crush something in one's hand" by the state power is "stop" of "statue of statute
The materials are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
PS: White House replied to me that she was seriously
considering a satisfactory solution to this problem.
I am waiting for the result. I hope that there is no lie.
If the URL of the web of the material is shown below,
please email me. (Respond a private URL).
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!