To President Trump
2020-01-22: Dear Sir,
"Intelligence agencies" such as the "CIA" should investigate Japanese "stakeholders." "Leaving Japan" of "Carlos Ghosn" knew not only Ghosn but also lawyers, Nissan, prosecutors and the Prime Minister's Office. All actions of "Carlos Ghosn" were being monitored by "watchmen (detectives)." This is the “how to do” in Japan's judicial administration.で す It's totally "far farce"
Part 1. A security company, commissioned by Nissan, has been monitoring bailed Ghosn's bail.
Ghosn's lawyer, Hironaka, had promised to monitor the court and security cameras.
At the court's request, the lawyer submits "surveillance data" to the court.
Prosecutors cannot monitor Carlos Ghosn by law.
So the prosecutor would have asked Nissan for monitoring.
"Nissan" was asking security companies to monitor behavior.
This is acknowledged by Nissan.
A security company would have reported Nissan the action of "Carlos Ghosn" in real time.
Nissan would have received the report and reported to the Prosecutor in real time.
However, Carlos Ghosn noticed the follow-up of the Guard, and consulted a lawyer.
The lawyer filed a "criminal complaint" on December 27.
Nissan says it has lifted surveillance on December 29 following a "criminal complaint."
December 29, around noon. The appearance of "Carlos Ghosn" going out
of his home alone was reflected on the "security camera".
Perhaps the "watchman" (detective) "followed" to "Kanku".
And it is easy to guess that they were monitoring everything
under instructions from the prosecutor.
Therefore, it is easy to guess that the prosecution had a detailed understanding
of the plans and departure facts of Carlos Ghosn.
The security company's "surveillance (detective)" contract ends at 23:59 on December 29.
Japanese detectives are excellent.
The detective in charge of Ghosn's surveillance would be "a retired police officer."
Prosecutors would have immediately reported this to the "Turkish prosecutor's office."
Turkish prosecutors have arrested four pilots and an operating company executive.
All Japanese were surprised at the speedy arrest of Turkey.
Many of the Internet people "wait" for "this departure" to "become a TV movie".
Is this departure a “what a farce” “farce play”?
The prosecution and the court have made "Carlos Ghosn" a "fugitive"
and have eliminated a "trial" in Japan.
Prosecutor wins case "99.9%", but
The judiciary did not want to show the international community an "illegal trial."
"Carlos Ghosn left Japan on the day of surveillance release" "FNN PRIME".
Immigration law violations include not only me but also American “victims”.
Help us as well as help Carlos Ghosn's couple.
"Intelligent agencies" such as the "CIA" should investigate "stakeholders."
Will continue tomorrow
Please see "bill of indictment" で at the "Site" below.
In this case, only by seeing this "bill of indictment",
you can understand the "error of applicable law".
Please see the "English translation" and "Japanese original" PDF.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation in English “Indictment letter letter of indictment
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be exact, do it yourself.
● Original Japanese Indictment letter of indictment
`` Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese) ''
The English translation is incorrect. Please see the above "PDF" for English translation.
● Please see the relevant laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
2) Penal code
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
Part 2. I'm "appealing" for two things.
`` Revised on November 4, 2019 ''
I am not only me, but also Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims of the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to solve it by terrorism.
1. Foreigners engaged in "illegal work" other than "status of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law "Illegal labor crimes."
In contrast, the Immigration Control Law punishes employees who are "causal"
for illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
(crimes for promoting illegal employment).
However, Japanese justice has "punished" only foreigners, but not "employees."
This clearly violates Article 14 of the Japanese Constitution,
the principle of equality under the law.
And it violates international law that prohibits "consciously" punishing only foreigners.
If the employer who hired a foreigner illegally is "innocent,"
the foreigner who was illegally worked is also "innocent." .
2. The prosecutor "applied" Article 70 and Article 62
of the Penal Code "crimes to support other offenses" to Article 70
of the Immigration Law for the reason of "Support of Article 22-4-4
of the Immigration Law" Wrong with the law you do. "
"Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law" is the disposition of a person
who has obtained a status of residence by false application.
In the past, the Immigration Law did not punish anyone who obtained a status
of residence through a false application (former Articles 70 and 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Control Act was enacted in the 192nd Extraordinary Diet,
which stipulated penalties for those who obtained a status of residence due to false applications,
those who assisted them, workplaces, lawyers, administrative scriveners and school staff.
It has been enforced since January 1, 2017.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippines, a Philippine embassy official" is 100% "innocent."
“Reference”: A foreigner has performed an act prescribed
in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law
(acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
Dispositions include "cancellation of status of residence" and "forced deportation"
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code" Sin to support
other crimes "cannot be applied.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act pointed out
by the “Indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law.
The public prosecutor has "squeezed, crush something in one's hand" of the "bill of indictment."
However, "crush something in one's hand" by the state power is "stop"
of "statue of statute of limitations".
The materials are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
PS: White House replied to me that she was seriously considering a satisfactory solution
to this problem. I am waiting for the result. I hope that there is no lie.
If the URL of the web of the material is shown below,
please email me. (Respond a private URL).
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!