2020-02-03: Dear Sirs,
"New Coronavirus" Why do Japanese media hide this fact? Why does the Japanese government regulate the reporting of this fact? "The new coronavirus may have originated in a laboratory in Wuhan, related to China's secret biological weapons program," the Washington Post.
Part 1. Overseas media "publish" "secret information" of "new coronavirus".
The White House also knows this information.
Therefore, the United States banned entry from Wuhan when the first patient occurred.
The Philippine has "banned entry" before the patient "emits". The aircraft was "returned".
SNS is full of "anger" about the slow response of the Japanese government.
The Japanese government "chartered the aircraft" and headed for rescue.
Companies that value the lives of their employees are moving ahead of the government
and have their employees "returned home."
The Japanese government "protected" the Chinese government rather than the people.
However, criticism of the Abe Cabinet has increased as news has emerged about the measures of each country.
So finally the government "chartered the aircraft" and headed for rescue.
The Abe Cabinet cannot afford to consider the people because of Abe's personal suspicions
and the scandal of the Minister and the members of the LDP.
The Abe Cabinet will probably lose if we hold a general election now.
Under these circumstances, the incident of "bacteria weapons" in China occurred.
The Washington Post has written an article titled The New Coronavirus is a Weapon Version of SARS.
By Bill Garts-The Washington Times-Sunday, January 26, 2020.
According to an Israeli biological weapons analyst,
a deadly animal-borne coronavirus that spreads around the world may have occurred in a laboratory
in Wuhan, related to China's secret biological weapons program.
Please see "bill of indictment" で at the "Site" below.
In this case, only by looking at this "bill of indictment",
you can understand the "error of applicable law".
Please see the "English translation" and "Japanese original" PDF.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation in English “Indictment letter of indictment
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be exact, do it yourself.
● Original Japanese `` letter of indictment ''
`` Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese) ''
The English translation is incorrect. Please see the above "PDF" for English translation.
● See related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
2) Penal code
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
Part 2. I'm "appealing" two things.
`` Revised on November 4, 2019 ''
I am not only me, but also Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims of the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to solve it by terrorism.
1. Foreigners engaged in "illegal work" other than "status of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law,
"Illegal labor crimes."
The Immigration Control Law, on the other hand, punishes employees who are "causal"
for illegal work under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
(crime for promoting illegal employment).
However, Japanese justice has "punished" only foreigners, but not "employees."
This clearly violates Article 14 of the Japanese Constitution, the principle of equality under the law.
And it violates international law that prohibits "consciously" punishing only foreigners.
If an employer who hired a foreigner illegally is "innocent,"
a foreigner who has been illegally worked is also "innocent." .
2. The prosecutor "applied" Article 70 and Article 62
of the Penal Code "crimes to support other offenses" to Article 70
of the Immigration Law on the grounds of "Support of Article 22-4-4
of the Immigration Control Law" Wrong with the law. "
“Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law” is the disposal of a person
who has obtained a status of residence by making a false application.
In the past, the Immigration Control Law did not punish anyone
who obtained a status of residence through a false application (former Articles 70 and 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Control Act was enacted in the 192nd Extraordinary Diet,
which stipulated penalties for those who obtained status of residence due to false applications,
their employers who assisted them, their workplaces,
lawyers, administrative scriveners and school staff.
It has been enforced since January 1, 2017.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippines, a Philippine embassy official" is 100% "innocent."
"Reference": A foreigner has performed an act prescribed
in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law
(acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
But there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
Dispositions include "cancellation of status of residence" and "forced deportation"
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code" Sin to support other crimes "cannot be applied.
The "reason for crime" in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law pointed out
by the "indictment" has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law.
The public prosecutor has "smashed, crush something in one's hand" on the "bill of indictment."
However, "crush something in one's hand" by state power is "stop" of "statutory limitation,
statute of limitations".
The materials are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
PS: White House replied to me that she was seriously considering a satisfactory solution to this problem.
I am waiting for the result. I hope that there is no lie.
If the URL of the web of the material is shown below, please email me. (Respond a private URL).
Please contact us if you hav