Japan's Justice in the Dark

Please support so that Japan will be governed under the law, fundamental human rights will be protected, and it will become a country complying with international law

Nagano Opinion To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister This "new coronavirus" is a "weapon virus". China is "NO" for support requests from the United States.


To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister


2020-02-06: Dear Sir,
This "new coronavirus" is a "weapon virus". China is "NO" for support requests from the United States.
You should know that "weapon viruses" are more scary than "nuclear weapons". The media is interviewing Japanese who returned from Wuhan on a charter plane with no defense. This returnee may be an "infested person." Internet people make the media "idiot". The media is broadcasting "dangerous acts." See The British BBC's "New Coronavirus" Also Infects During "Incubation Period".


Part 1. Japanese media cannot be trusted.
The Japanese media does not report any "disadvantageous facts" to the Japanese government.
And "ignorance".

The new coronavirus "is transmitted during the incubation period."
BBC @ Japan on January 27, 2020.
https://www.bbc.com/japanese/51259679

The SARS and Ebola viruses exert their "infectiveness" after symptoms appear in patients.
These epidemics are relatively easy to stop.
You can identify and isolate those who show symptoms, or monitor those
who come in contact with patients.

On the other hand, influenza is the most famous virus transmitted before symptoms develop.

It is unclear at this stage whether the new virus will become a global pandemic like swine flu.

But stopping such "asymptomatic but contagious viruses" is a daunting task for Chinese authorities.

The big problem still remains.
What is the magnitude of the "power of infection" during the incubation period?
Is the “Chinese infected person traveling abroad” “scattering the virus”
before the symptoms appear?

And why did the National Health and Health Commission say the virus's "infectiousness" was "growing"?

The Chinese government continues to be tacit.
WHO accepts it.
Internet people say that China controls WHO with the power of money.

Continue tomorrow.

Please see "bill of indictment" で at the "Site" below.
In this case, only by looking at this "bill of indictment",
you can understand the "error of applicable law".

Please see the "English translation" and "Japanese original" PDF.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation in English “Indictment letter of indictment
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be exact, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese `` letter of indictment ''
`` Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese) ''
The English translation is incorrect. Please see the above "PDF" for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● See related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Penal code
Penal Code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Part 2. I'm "appealing" two things.
`` Revised on November 4, 2019 ''
I am not only me, but also Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims of the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to solve it by terrorism.

1. Foreigners engaged in "illegal work" other than "status of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law,
"Illegal labor crimes."
The Immigration Control Law, on the other hand, punishes employees who are "causal"
for illegal work under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
(crime for promoting illegal employment).
However, Japanese justice has "punished" only foreigners, but not "employees."
This clearly violates Article 14 of the Japanese Constitution, the principle of equality under the law.
And it violates international law that prohibits "consciously" punishing only foreigners.
If an employer who hired a foreigner illegally is "innocent,"
a foreigner who has been illegally worked is also "innocent." .

2. The prosecutor "applied" Article 70
and Article 62 of the Penal Code "crimes to support other offenses" to Article 70
of the Immigration Law on the grounds of "Support
of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law" Wrong with the law. "
“Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law” is the disposal of a person
who has obtained a status of residence by making a false application.
:::::
In the past, the Immigration Control Law did not punish anyone
who obtained a status of residence through a false application (former Articles 70 and 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Control Act was enacted in the 192nd Extraordinary Diet,
which stipulated penalties for those who obtained status of residence due to false applications,
their employers who assisted them, their workplaces, lawyers,
administrative scriveners and school staff.
It has been enforced since January 1, 2017.
:::::

"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippines, a Philippine embassy official" is 100% "innocent."

"Reference": A foreigner has performed an act prescribed
in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law
(acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
But there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
Dispositions include "cancellation of status of residence"
and "forced deportation" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code" Sin to support other crimes "cannot be applied.
The "reason for crime" in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law pointed out
by the "indictment" has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law.

The public prosecutor has "smashed, crush something in one's hand" on the "bill of indictment."
However, "crush something in one's hand" by state power is "stop" of "statutory limitation,
statute of limitations".

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: White House replied to me that she was seriously considering a satisfactory solution to this problem.
I am waiting for the result. I hope that there is no lie.
If the URL of the web of the material is shown below,

please email me. (Respond a private URL).
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Yasuhiro Nagano

 


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/

Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp