2020-02-21: Dear Sir,
Carlos Ghosn signs a contract with a big agent by turning his story into a visual work. The world is interested in him. We look forward to Mr. Obitz's "realization". Carlos Ghosn is acquitted. Prove "Innocent Not guilty" in the movie. Make a "courtroom scene" in the movie.
Part 1. Here is my scenario.
The movie starts with a scene that escaped Japan in a way similar to a movie last December.
Next, a summary from his birth is developed.
And the "courtroom scene" begins.
The prosecution asserts that Carlos Ghosn's illegality is regulated by Japanese law.
But in the international community, "equality under the law" must be maintained.
It is also guaranteed in Article 14 of the Japanese Constitution.
The “illegal act” claimed by the prosecutor is an act that can be assumed.
Therefore, "in-house rules" are set to prevent such actions.
Since Nissan is a listed company, "in-house rules" are strict.
Prosecutors refer to Carlos Ghosn and Greg Kelly as "misconduct."
But the actual spending is done through the "spend department".
At the meeting, confirmations such as “minutes of the Board of Directors” are made
in accordance with internal regulations.
"Accident" is executed in "breach" of this internal rule.
It is a collusion of related departments, directors and corporate auditors.
Such cases cannot be performed without conspiracy.
However, prosecutors are colluding with stakeholders and conducting a "judicial transaction."
Traditionally, Japanese and US companies have conducted in-house investigations
and resolved in-house prior to criminal cases.
It is clear that employees who are members of the union were also complicit.
To prevent "fraud = injustice", an "audit department" has been established separately
from "auditors" to "monitor" such "fraud = injustice".
So this case will never happen unless it is a violation of "organization-wide" in the company.
It was "arbitrary" to make the company-wide crime "misconduct" by Carlos Ghosn and Greg Kelly.
Everyone should be punished, including union members.
Failure to dispose of all will violate Article 14 of the Japanese Constitution "Equality Under the Law".
Thus Carlos Ghosn and Greg Kelly are acquitted.
I'm "sueing" the prosecution's illegality in an "Immigration Law Violation Case."
A foreigner has performed "Improper labor" under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
However, they do not punish the employer who hired them under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law.
This is a violation of Article 14 of the Constitution.
And it violates international law, which prohibits "arbitrary" punishment of foreigners.
Ghosn's filmization is a good opportunity to democratize Japan's judicial system.
I look forward to "moving into a film".
Make "The world is amazing", "Great movie", please.
Ghosn signs a contract with a big agent to make his own life a video work.
This is a Bloomberg article.
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "bill of indictment" で at the "Site" below.
In this case, only by looking at this "bill of indictment",
you can understand the "error of applicable law".
Please see the "English translation" and "Japanese original" PDF.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation in English “Indictment letter of indictment
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be exact, do it yourself.
● Original Japanese `` letter of indictment ''
`` Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese) ''
The English translation is incorrect. Please see the above "PDF" for English translation.
● See related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
2) Penal code
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
Part 2. I'm "appealing" two things.
`` Revised on November 4, 2019 ''
I am not only me, but also Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims of the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to solve it by terrorism.
1. Foreigners engaged in "illegal work" other than "status of residence". But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law, "Illegal labor crimes."
The Immigration Control Law, on the other hand, punishes employees
who are "causal" for illegal work under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
(crime for promoting illegal employment).
However, Japanese justice has "punished" only foreigners, but not "employees."
This clearly violates Article 14 of the Japanese Constitution, the principle of equality under the law.
And it violates international law that prohibits "consciously" punishing only foreigners.
If an employer who hired a foreigner illegally is "innocent,"
a foreigner who has been illegally worked is also "innocent." .
2. The prosecutor "applied" Article 60 and Article 62
of the Penal Code "crimes to support other offenses" to Article 70 of the Immigration Act
for the reason of "Support for Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
Wrong with the law. "
“Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law” is the disposal
of a person who has obtained a status of residence by making a false application.
In the past, the Immigration Control Law did not punish anyone who obtained a status
of residence through a false application (former Articles 70 and 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Control Law was enacted in the 192nd Extraordinary Diet,
which stipulated penalties for those who obtained a status of residence due to false applications,
those who assisted them, workplaces, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
It has been enforced since January 1, 2017.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippines, a Philippine embassy official" is 100% "innocent."
"Reference": A foreigner has performed an act prescribed
in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law
(acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
But there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
Dispositions include "cancellation of status of residence" and "forced deportation"
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code" Sin to support other crimes "cannot be applied.
The "reason for crime" in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law pointed out
by the "indictment" has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law.
The public prosecutor has "smashed, crush something in one's hand" on the "bill of indictment."
However, "crush something in one's hand" by state power is "stop" of "statutory limitation,
statute of limitations".
The materials are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
PS: White House replied to me that she was seriously considering a satisfactory solution to this problem.
I am waiting for the result. I hope that there is no lie.
If the URL of the web of the material is shown below, please email me. (Respond a private URL).
Please contact us if you have any questions.