To President Trump
2020-02-26: Dear Sir,
The President of the Philippines, Duterte,
informed the United States on February 11 of a unilateral abolition of the Visiting Army Status Agreement (VFA)
with the US military. Mr Trump says "don't care" about "destroying the Philippine Status Agreement."
This is based on "criticism from the United States" of the drug war.
This fight is "cause" by "President Duterte", you are bad.
I don't know what will happen in the future!
Part 1. It is NewsWeek on February 14, 2020.
The Philippine government has notified the United States that the status agreement
with the US military has been abolished. What is the "true meaning" of "runaway duterte"?
See below for details.
Gift to Xi Jinping, which aim to "advance" to the South China Sea? Where is Duterte's true aim?
The President of the Philippines, Duterte,
informed the United States on February 11 of a one-sided abolition
of the Visiting Forces Status Agreement (VFA),
which decided on US military exercises in the Philippines.
The agreement automatically expires 180 days after notification.
The Trump administration remains essentially unchanged
in its diplomatic tactics to pressure the Chinese side
through `` free navigation '' mobilizing U.S. Navy vessels in the South China Sea,
effectively abandoning the agreement in the South China Sea dispute.
It is said that the impact is not so great.
February 13, 2020 Reuters.
Mr Trump says the "breaking of the Philippine Status Agreement" is "don't mind."
The Philippine government states that the "Agreement" is "unequal content" for the Philippines.
"There is basically no Philippine jurisdiction over US soldiers who have committed crimes
in the Philippines."
For example, "biased privileges" are given to "US soldiers."
As a Japanese, I can understand this.
This should be revised.
However, the intention was that the former Secretary of State Police,
Senator Delarosa, applied for a visa in the United States and was rejected by US authorities.
The US government has repeatedly warned of criticism that Duterte's hard-line measures
include "human-rights abuses when investigating without legal process."
"Ultra-regulatory measures" such as "firing" without warrants
by investigators or the "shooting and killing" of suspects who resisted at drug control sites.
He is one of the spearheads of drug investigations, and is close to President Duterte.
President Duterte 「should" govern under the law. "
I email the Philippine Embassy daily.
The Japanese government has illegally turned "Philippines diplomats and embassy officials" into "criminals."
President Duterte should demand the Japanese government for their "restoration of honor" and reparations.
President Duterte should conduct politics based on international law, human rights and, above all, "justice".
It is the worst to fall into the Japanese government's "Honey Trap".
President Trump, Ganbare!
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "bill of indictment" で at the "Site" below.
In this case, only by looking at this "bill of indictment",
you can understand the "error of applicable law".
Please see the "English translation" and "Japanese original" PDF.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation in English “Indictment letter of indictment
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be exact, do it yourself.
● Original Japanese `` letter of indictment ''
`` Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese) ''
The English translation is incorrect. Please see the above "PDF" for English translation.
● See related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
2) Penal code
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
Part 2. I'm "appealing" two things.
`` Revised on November 4, 2019 ''
I am not only me, but also Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims of the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to solve it by terrorism.
1. Foreigners engaged in "illegal work" other than "status of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law, "Illegal labor crimes."
The Immigration Control Law, on the other hand,
punishes employees who are "causal" for illegal work under Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (crime for promoting illegal employment).
However, Japanese justice has "punished" only foreigners, but not "employees."
This clearly violates Article 14 of the Japanese Constitution, the principle of equality under the law.
And it violates international law that prohibits "consciously" punishing only foreigners.
If an employer who hired a foreigner illegally is "innocent,"
a foreigner who has been illegally worked is also "innocent." .
2. The prosecutor "applied" Article 60 and Article 62
of the Penal Code "crimes to support other offenses" to Article 70 of the Immigration Act
for the reason of "Support for Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
Wrong with the law. "
“Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law” is the disposal of a person
who has obtained a status of residence by making a false application.
In the past, the Immigration Control Law did not punish anyone
who obtained a status of residence through a false application (former Articles 70 and 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Control Act was enacted in the 192th Extraordinary Diet,
which stipulated penalties for those who obtained a status of residence due to false applications,
those who assisted them, workplaces, lawyers, administrative scriveners and school staff.
It has been enforced since January 1, 2017.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippines, a Philippine embassy official" is 100% "innocent."
"Reference": A foreigner has performed an act prescribed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law
(acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
But there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
Dispositions include "cancellation of status of residence" and "forced deportation"
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code" Sin to support other crimes "cannot be applied.
The "reason for crime" in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law pointed out
by the "indictment" has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law.
The public prosecutor has "smashed, crush something in one's hand" on the "bill of indictment."
However, "crush something in one's hand" by state power is "stop"
of "statutory limitation, statute of limitations".
The materials are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
PS: White House replied to me that she was seriously considering a satisfactory solution to this problem.
I am waiting for the result. I hope that there is no lie.
If the URL of the web of the material is shown below, please email me. (Respond a private URL).
For uncertainties, please contact us!