2020-03-06: Dear Sirs,
The United States has finally noticed. After China's accession to the WTO, the U.S. trade deficit with China has increased year by year, losing more than 3 million employment opportunities during this time, and China has been trying to avoid trade distortions, currency manipulation and infringement of workers' rights. It flooded the United States with a plethora of low-priced products and China-subsidized products, severely damaging US manufacturing. China, the world's second largest GDP, claims to be a "developing country." It's a joke that makes the world laugh!
Part 1. "They are no longer developing countries"
The United States considers eliminating China's "preferential treatment for developing countries."
It is NTDTV on February 20, 2020.
The US government has recently announced that some trading partners,
including China, are no longer recognized as "developing countries"
in order to lower the terms of the investigation into unfair export subsidies.
Critics have said that if their status as a developing country were lost,
China would not be able to make any excuse for violating its WTO rules.
President Trump has repeatedly criticized that China, despite being the world's second largest economy,
has taken advantage of the WTO's title in developing countries to gain unfair advantage.
China's accession to the WTO in 2001 also sparked US dissatisfaction.
The WTO believes that the WTO has not taken measures to deal with the problem
of industrial subsidies from China and other countries.
Mr. Trump claims that China is "free ride" on the free trade system and insists
on "hard-line measures against China".
It has called on China to thoroughly protect intellectual property rights and to eliminate subsidies.
He even told U.S. media last summer, "If the WTO doesn't do it well, it may leave."
The above is below.
If China, which ranks second in GDP, is a "developing country",
then everything below Japan, which ranks third in GDP, is a "developing country".
If China does not withdraw "developing countries",
The "WTO" should dissolve and create a new international organization.
With the outbreak of the "new coronavirus", "interaction" with China should be reviewed.
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "bill of indictment" で at the "Site" below.
In this case, only by looking at this "bill of indictment",
you can understand the "error of applicable law".
Please see the "English translation" and "Japanese original" PDF.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation in English “Indictment letter of indictment
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be exact, do it yourself.
● Original Japanese `` letter of indictment ''
`` Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese) ''
The English translation is incorrect. Please see the above "PDF" for English translation.
● See related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
2) Penal code
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
Part 2. I'm "appealing" two things.
`` Revised on November 4, 2019 ''
I am not only me, but also Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims of the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to solve it by terrorism.
1. Foreigners engaged in "illegal work" other than "status of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law,
"Illegal labor crimes."
The Immigration Control Law, on the other hand,
punishes employees who are "causal" for illegal work under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
(crime for promoting illegal employment).
However, Japanese justice has "punished" only foreigners, but not "employees."
This clearly violates Article 14 of the Japanese Constitution, the principle of equality under the law.
And it violates international law that prohibits "consciously" punishing only foreigners.
If an employer who hired a foreigner illegally is "innocent,"
a foreigner who has been illegally worked is also "innocent." .
2. The prosecution "applied" Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code "crimes to support other offenses" to Article 70
of the Immigration Law on the grounds of "Support for Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
Wrong with the law. "
“Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law” is the disposal of a person
who has obtained a status of residence by making a false application.
In the past, the Immigration Control Law did not punish anyone
who obtained a status of residence through a false application (former Articles 70 and 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Control Act was enacted in the 192th Extraordinary Diet,
which stipulated penalties for those who obtained a status of residence due to false applications,
those who assisted them, workplaces, lawyers, administrative scriveners and school staff.
It has been enforced since January 1, 2017.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippines, a Philippine embassy official" is 100% "innocent."
"Reference": A foreigner has performed an act prescribed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law
(acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
But there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
Dispositions include "cancellation of status of residence" and "forced deportation"
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code" Sin to support other crimes "cannot be applied.
The "reason for crime" in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act pointed out
by the "indictment" has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law.
The public prosecutor has "smashed, crush something in one's hand" on the "bill of indictment."
However, "crush something in one's hand" by state power is "stop"
of "statutory limitation, statute of limitations".
The materials are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
PS: The White House replied to me
that I was seriously considering a satisfactory solution to this problem.
I am waiting for the result. I hope that there is no lie.
If the URL of the web of the material is shown below, please email me. (Respond a private URL).
Please contact us if you have any questions.