Japan's Justice in the Dark

Please support so that Japan will be governed under the law, fundamental human rights will be protected, and it will become a country complying with international law

To President Trump I think this answer is "common" in many countries. "We don't need Chinese anymore"

To President Trump

2020-04-15: Dear Sirs,
"#We don't need Chinese anymore". Japan lost everything because it wanted "inbound" from China. According to Japan's Teikoku Databank, the number of bankruptcies in March was 744, 14% more than the previous year. The Japanese will not spend money even after the "New Corona" is over. Someday, the same thing may happen, so there is no choice but to save money.

Part 1. April 8, 2020, ANNnewsCH.
According to Teikoku Databank, the number of bankruptcies in March was 744,
14% more than the previous year. By industry, bankruptcies have increased significantly
in industries affected by the decline in consumption due to the new coronavirus,
such as restaurants and hotels.
The government has been providing financial support to prevent corporate bankruptcy,
but the damage to micro-enterprises is particularly severe.
Teikoku Databank says a new coronavirus bankruptcy will "occur" for at least the next few months.
And, "the number of occurrences" may continue to be "high."

In January 2020, the outbreak of a new virus in Wuhan, China, caused Japan to be confused.
When the Lunar New Year begins in China, many Chinese come to Japan.
In other words, a large number of infected people enter the country.
Japanese appealed to the government to ban Chinese people from entering the country.
However, the government did not listen to the public saying that those
who did not go to "Wuhan" would not be infected.

There were two reasons for forcing Chinese to enter the country.
One is to make money by accepting tourists from China.
Second, not accepting Chinese will stop trade between Japan and China.
The Japanese government, which prioritizes making money, could not be stopped.

In addition, even after the outbreak, the government refused to test "suspicious individuals" to "hide them."
The reason is to "execute" the Tokyo Olympics.
This "hiding the infected" has led to the proliferation of infected people today.

The opinion on the net
Japan lost everything in search of "inbound from China". "
No one knows when the New Corona will converge.
However, the people do not spend money even after the corona is over.
It has no choice but to "keep a deposit" because the same thing may happen again.
The only way to solve this is to refuse Chinese acceptance.
I think this answer is "common" in many countries.
"We don't need Chinese anymore"

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "bill of indictment" で at the "Site" below.
In this case, only by looking at this "bill of indictment",
you can understand the "error of applicable law".

Please see the "English translation" and "Japanese original" PDF.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation in English “Indictment letter of indictment
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be exact, do it yourself.
● Original Japanese `` letter of indictment ''
`` Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese) ''
The English translation is incorrect. Please see the above "PDF" for English translation.
● See related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
2) Penal code
Penal Code
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan

Part 2. I'm "appealing" two things.
`` Revised on November 4, 2019 ''
I am not only me, but also Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims of the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to solve it by terrorism.

1. Foreigners engaged in "illegal work" other than "status of residence". But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law, "Illegal labor crimes."
The Immigration Control Law, on the other hand,
punishes employees who are "causal" for illegal work under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
(crime for promoting illegal employment).
However, Japanese justice has "punished" only foreigners, but not "employees."
This clearly violates Article 14 of the Japanese Constitution, the principle of equality under the law.
And it violates international law that prohibits "consciously" punishing only foreigners.
If an employer who hired a foreigner illegally is "innocent,"
a foreigner who has been illegally worked is also "innocent." .

2. The prosecutor "applied" Article 70 and Article 62 of the Penal Code "crimes to support other offenses"
to Article 70 of the Immigration Law on the grounds of "Support of Article 22-4-4
of the Immigration Control Law" Wrong with the law. "
“Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law” is the disposal of a person
who has obtained a status of residence by false application.
In the past, the Immigration Control Law did not punish anyone
who obtained a status of residence through a false application (former Articles 70 and 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Control Act was enacted in the 192nd Extraordinary Diet,
which stipulated penalties for those who obtained status of residence due to false applications,
their employers who assisted them, their workplaces, lawyers, administrative scriveners and school staff.
It has been enforced since January 1, 2017.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippines, a Philippine embassy official" is 100% "innocent."

"Reference": A foreigner has performed an act prescribed
in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law
(acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
But there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
Dispositions include "cancellation of status of residence" and "forced deportation" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code" Sin to support other crimes "cannot be applied.
The "reason for crime" in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law pointed out
by the "indictment" has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law.

The public prosecutor has "smashed, crush something in one's hand" on the "bill of indictment."
However, "crush something in one's hand" by state power is "stop" of "statutory limitation,
statute of limitations".
The materials are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: White House replied to me that she was seriously considering a satisfactory solution to this problem.
I am waiting for the result. I hope that there is no lie.
If the URL of the web of the material is shown below, please email me. (Respond a private URL).

Yasuhiro Nagano

For uncertainties, please contact us!