2020-05-15: Dear Sir,
Defective medical supplies purchased from China in Spain, Czech Republic, Turkey, etc. Even in Canada, 1 million Chinese masks are defective. Canada argues that it should build its own supply chain to ensure national security. This is a great opinion. Each country should practice.
Part 1. The cloth mask that the Japanese government imported from China had "adhesion"
of "insects" and "adhesion" of "mold".
The imported masks were planned to be given priority over "pregnant women".
"Virus" is dangerous even if it is not "Corona".
Since the medical supplies purchased from China were reported to be defective in Spain,
the Czech Republic, Turkey, etc., the Canadian government recently announced
that about 1 million KN95 masks purchased from China did not meet the standard. Did. .
So the Canadian government has announced that it will not "distribute" Chinese-made masks to "medical" workers.
In addition, the city of Toronto announced in early April
that it would "collect" more than 60,000 Chinese-made masks, which have quality problems.
This has exacerbated the "lack of status" of "protective supplies" in Canada's "medical industry."
Between January 24 and the end of February, China has bought 2.2 billion masks
from around the world, according to the White House in the United States.
Shuvaloy Majumdar, an Indo-Pacific geopolitical expert
at the Canadian think tank McDonald's Raleigh Institute, said.
He said China has been masking the epidemic in Wuhan since the end of last year,
and at the same time has begun "predatory" of "protective clothing" in "Each countries".
Mr. Schvaloy Magender, Researcher, McDonald's Raleigh Institute
"China's mask production capacity has now recovered significantly
and is beginning to supply personal protective equipment to the world.
This practice is very predatory.
China has taken advantage of trade and supply chains to gain political capital on the world stage.
I have to feel anxiety. "
Secretary of State Pompeo said in a media interview on May 3 that the Chinese virus came from a Wuhan laboratory.
A recent report by the US Department of Homeland Security also revealed
that China was concealing the epidemic while at the same time stocking a large amount of medical supplies.
The report said, "The Chinese government is trying to deny export restrictions
and is trying to cover up these moves by delaying the submission of trade data.
According to trade data,
China is likely to have stockpiled medicines before it officially notified WHO of the virus' infection. "
We are “unsatisfied” with what the Chinese government does.
China will not accept whatever evidence the international community puts on China.
The international community should exclude China.
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "bill of indictment" on the "site" below.
Just looking at this "bill of indictment" in this case, you can understand the "error of applicable law".
Please see PDFs of "English translation" and "Japanese original text".
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● English translation “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano Kin Gungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, please do it yourself.
● Japanese original “letter of indictment”
`` Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese) ''
The English translation is incorrect. For English translation, see "PDF" above.
● See related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
2) Criminal law
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
Part 2. I "come" for two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I am not only me, not only Chinese or Philippine,
Fighting for many victims of the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to solve it by terrorism.
1. A foreigner has performed "illegal work" other than "resident status". But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act, "Crime of Illegal Labor."
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who have a "causal relationship" with illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
(a crime that promotes illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but not "employed".
This clearly violates Article 14 of the Japanese Constitution, "the principle of equality under the law."
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "consciously".
If the employer who illegally hired a foreigner is "innocent", then the foreigner
who was illegally worked is also "innocent". .
2. The prosecution "applied" the "crime to support other crimes"
of Article 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act",
but "Applied" It's a legal mistake to do. "
“Immigration Law Article 22-4-4” is a disposition of a person
who has obtained a status of residence by a false application.
In the past, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties for persons
who acquired their status of residence through false applications (former Article 70, Article 74-6).
The revised Immigration Control Act was enacted at the 192nd Extraordinary Diet session to apply
for penal provisions to persons who obtained residence status by false application,
employers, lawyers, administrative scriveners, school staff, etc.
It is "enforced from January 1, 2017".
"I, Kin Gungaku, diplomat of the Philippines, staff of the Embassy of the Philippines" are 100% "innocent".
"Reference": A foreigner has performed the acts prescribed
in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act
(acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" and "compulsory deportation" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, “Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code,“
Crime in Supporting Other Crimes, ”cannot be applied.
The “reasons of crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act,
which the “indictment” points out, have no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
The prosecution has "crushed, crush something in one's hand," "the complaint, bill of indictment."
However, "crush something in one's hand" by the state power is a "stop" of "statute of limitations".
The materials are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
PS: The White House replied to me that this issue was seriously considered a solution that I was happy with.
I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.
If the URL of the document web page is as shown below, please email us. (I will reply with a private URL).
Please contact us if you have any questions.