2020-05-18: Dear Sir,
In Japan, the hashtag "I protest the proposed revision of the Public Prosecutor's Law" has been a hot topic on "Revision of the Public Prosecutor's Law" on Twitter. Is it so important to “change” the “personnel system” of the “prosecutor” during the “corona shock”? From such "questions, doubts" to "demo on the Internet" has expanded rapidly. The number of posts with hashtags has exceeded 4.7 million. Prosecutors in Japan continue to "illegitimate" with "exclusive rights to prosecution". The members of the Diet are frightened by the prosecutor and have a "don't know" face. I agree that the Cabinet should "govern the prosecution" "under the law." But the huge "#Net Demo" is "Like"!
Part 1. Representative Yukio Edano of the "Constitutional Democratic Party" is "pursuing"
that "the amendment was submitted" under the situation of "new Corona".
He points out that "calm discussions" at the "people and the Diet" are difficult
and that meetings and demonstrations are not possible.
He stressed that this was "a thief at the scene of a fire" in "confused."
The number of posts with hashtags has exceeded 4.7 million.
Governor Yoshimura of Osaka Prefecture, who was a lawyer, cast a precondition for the discussion,
"Who has the personnel right of the prosecution's top?"
"The Public Prosecutor's Law stipulates that the right to personnel changes is in the Cabinet. why? ”
The “prosecution organization” has a powerful national power.
I think it is rather sound that the government, which is made up of parliamentarians
who are elected representatives, has the final "rights for personnel changes."
If the prosecution becomes "self-righteous", who will "suppress" it?
"Nobody can do it." Ultimately, it can be suppressed only by the person who has the "right to change personnel".
Governor Yoshimura understands the prosecution system well.
No Japanese parliamentarians or bar associations can point out prosecutors' "immigration law violation cases."
Japan's "judicial system" is collapsing because no one can stop the prosecution's runaway.
2010 and 2013 “Immigration Law Violations” cost me and many foreigners.
(See Part 2 below for details).
The Japan Bar Association says the "Japan Bar Association" is "unpowered".
Parliamentarians cannot understand “violation of Article 31 of the Constitution”
and “violation of international law” that even foreigners understand.
I agree that the Cabinet "holds" the prosecutor's "rights for personnel changes."
I hope the Cabinet Office will now listen to my "daily email".
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "bill of indictment" on the "site" below.
Just looking at this "bill of indictment" in this case, you can understand the "error of applicable law".
Please see PDFs of "English translation" and "Original Japanese".
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● English translation “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano Kin Gungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, please do it yourself.
● Japanese original “letter of indictment”
`` Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese) ''
The English translation is incorrect. For English translation, see "PDF" above.
● See related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
2) Criminal law
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
Part 2. I "come" for two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I am not only me, not only Chinese and Philippine people,
Fighting for many victims of the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to solve it by terrorism.
1. A foreigner has performed "illegal work" other than "resident status". But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act, "Crime of Illegal Labor."
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" for illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
(a crime that promotes illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but not "employed".
This clearly violates Article 14 of the Constitution of Japan, "the principle of equality under the law."
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "consciously".
If the employer who illegally hired a foreigner is "innocent", then the foreigner
who was illegally worked is also "innocent". ..
2. The prosecution "applied" the "crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and 62 of the Penal Code against "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act",
but "Applied" It's a legal mistake to do. "
“Immigration Law Article 22-4-4” is a disposition of a person
who has obtained a status of residence by a false application.
In the past, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties for persons
who acquired their status of residence through false applications (old law Articles 70 and 74-6).
The revised Immigration Control Act was enacted at the 192nd Extraordinary Diet session,
which targets penal provisions for persons who acquired residence status through false applications,
employers who assisted them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
It is "enforced from January 1, 2017".
"I, KinGungaku, diplomat of the Philippines, staff of the Embassy of the Philippines" is 100% "innocent".
"Reference": A foreigner has performed the actions prescribed
in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act (acquisition of status of residence
by submitting false documents). However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "compulsory deportation" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code," Crime in Supporting Other Crimes ", cannot be applied.
The “reasons of crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
The prosecution has "crushed, crush something in one's hand," "the complaint, bill of indictment."
However, "crush something in one's hand" by the state power is "stop" of "statutory, limitations of limitations".
The materials are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
PS: The White House replied to me that he was seriously considering a solution that I was happy with.
I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.
If the URL of the document's website is as shown below, please email us. (I will reply with a private URL).
Please contact us if you have any questions.