Japan's Justice in the Dark

Please support so that Japan will be governed under the law, fundamental human rights will be protected, and it will become a country complying with international law

To President Trump The prosecution says "# Mandatory acceptance of complaints." # The prosecutor's crime is "I want to get away with murder". Japan is in a turmoil about the proposed revision of

To President Trump

2020-05-25: Dear Sir,
The prosecution says "# Mandatory acceptance of complaints." # The prosecutor's crime is "I want to get away with murder". Japan is in a turmoil about the proposed revision of the Public Prosecutor's Law to allow prosecutors to extend their retirement age. However, parliamentarians are not interested in the "non-acceptance" of the "complaint letter of complaint ...", which is a complaint of crime. Refusal is #case shelving ”. # A system should be established for all people to seek equal trial. # Parliamentarians, prosecutors, former prosecutors, and entertainers who are against the revision of the Public Prosecutor's Law should make "nonacceptance" a problem.

Part 1. If the prosecutor sets the “prosecution omplaint” to “no prosecution, non-prosecution”,
the “prosecution request” can be submitted to the “prosecution examination committee”.
However, if the prosecutor makes the "letter of complaint" or "bilt of indictment" "not accepted",
the criminal case will be "crushed".

I continue to sue "innocence of me and the Chinese" who was punished
for violating the Immigration Control Act of 2010.
In 2008, we decided to hire a Chinese person who will graduate in March 2009.
They obtained the “Visa” of “Technical Visa” and “Humanities International Visa”
with “Employment Contract” and “Graduation Certificate”.
However, in 2008 there was a "Lehman shock".
My company has canceled the hiring of Chinese.
After graduating, they continued to work at a restaurant where they worked part-time as a student.
So they were arrested for "non-qualified activities" in violation of the Immigration Control Act.
They are "one year in prison" for immigration law violation (non-qualified labor).
I was exiled due to the suspension of execution.
I was sentenced to "one and a half years' imprisonment" and "final fine of 500,000 yen"
for "execution" for violating the Immigration Control Act (labor outside my qualifications)
under the criminal law's "crime to support other crimes" ..
"The Chinese who were in charge of hiring the Chinese" were the same "sin" as I was.
However, he pleaded guilty and was "deported" in the "deferral of execution".

In 2012 and 2013, there was a “similar to us” “case of immigration law violation”
at the Embassy of the Philippines.
At this time, "Diplomatic officers and employees of the Philippine embassy" were arrested
for "offenses supporting other crimes" of the criminal law against "violation
of the Immigration Control Act" (non-qualified labor).
"Diplomatic officer" fled to "Philippines" before "arrest." (Same as Carlos Ghosn).

However, it is illegal to apply the "crime to support other crimes" of the criminal law
to the immigration law "unqualified labor".
The "reason for crime" in the "charge of indictment" "provided" the contract documents
for false employment to foreigners.
As a result, foreigners were granted "resident status".
Having obtained "resident status", foreigners were able to "work outside their status".

However, the "reason for the crime" in the "indictment, bill of indictment" is acquittal.
This is stipulated in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.

Those who have obtained "qualification for residence"
in the "fake employment contract documents" are cancellations of Article 22-4-4 "Residence status"
of the Immigration Control Act.
(This is an administrative sanction by the Minister of Justice).
In addition, in 2017, this “reason of crime” cannot be “criminal punishment”,
so “admission law revision” was made to enable “criminal punishment”.
Therefore I and (Kingungaku in Chinese) and diplomats and staff at the Philippine Embassy are not guilty.

Violation of the Immigration Control Act Chinese and Philippine people
who are “unqualified labor” are not guilty.
The reason is that the employers who hired them were not punished
by the Immigration Control Act, Article 73-2, "Crime that promotes illegal work."
This violates the Constitution of Japan "equality under the law"
and the international law "arbitrarily punishing foreigners".

With this in mind, I submitted the “billing bill of indictment”
and the “billing bill of Complaint” to the Tokyo District Public Prosecutor.
The reasons for the crimes were "Special public officer's abuse of power" and "False accusation".
According to the Supreme Court's "Indication of Precedents.",
If a "special public employee" "arrests and confines" a person for "why they are not guilty,"
the "abuse of special civil servant powers" is established.
No "proof" of "intentional" is required.
Of course. "I didn't know the law" is not forgiven by a legal expert.
However, the prosecution will not accept it no matter how many times it is submitted.
The reason is the "reply" that it is not a crime.

Ambassadors of some countries clearly support me as "a mistake in the applicable law."
Japan should be a country governed by the law.


It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "bill of indictment" on the "site" below.
Just looking at this "bill of indictment" in this case, you can understand the "error of applicable law".

Please see PDFs of "English translation" and "Original Japanese".
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● English translation “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano Kin Gungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, please do it yourself.
● Japanese original “letter of indictment”
`` Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese) ''
The English translation is incorrect. For English translation, see "PDF" above.
● See related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
2) Criminal law
Penal Code
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan

Part 2. I "come" for two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I am not only me, not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims of the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to solve it by terrorism.

1. A foreigner has performed "illegal work" other than "resident status". But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act, "Crime of Illegal Labor."
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who have a "causal relationship" with illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
(a crime that promotes illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but not "employed".
This clearly violates Article 14 of the Constitution of Japan, "the principle of equality under the law."
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "consciously".
If the employer who illegally hired a foreigner is "innocent",
then the foreigner who was illegally worked is also "innocent". ..

2. The prosecution "applied" the "crime to support other crimes"
in Article 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law",
but "Applied" It's a legal mistake to do. "
“Immigration Law Article 22-4-4” is a disposition of a person who has obtained a status
of residence by a false application.
In the past, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties
for persons who obtained status of residence through false applications (former law Articles 70 and 74-6).
A revised Immigration Control Act was enacted
at the 192nd Extraordinary Diet session to target penal provisions for persons
who obtained residence status through false applications, employers who assisted them,
lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
It is "enforced from January 1, 2017".
"I, Kin Gungaku, diplomat of the Philippine country, staff of the Philippine Embassy" are 100% "innocent".

"Reference": A foreigner has performed the acts prescribed
in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act (acquisition of status of residence
by submitting false documents). However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence" and "compulsory deportation" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code," Crime in Supporting Other Crimes ", cannot be applied.
The “reasons of crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act,
which the “indictment” points out, have no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.

The prosecution has "crushed, crush something in one's hand," "the complaint, bill of indictment."
However, "crush something in one's hand" by the state power is "stop" of "statutory, limitations of limitations".
The materials are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that he was seriously considering a solution that I was happy with.
I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.
If the URL of the document's website is as shown below, please email us. (I will reply with a private URL).

Yasuhiro Nagano

For uncertainties, please contact us!