2020-11-17: Dear Sir,
I was illegally punished in 2010 for a "immigration law violation case".
The reason is that we provided the Chinese with "false documents",
so the Chinese were granted a "status of residence".
Since the Chinese got a "status of residence", they were able to "work outside the status".
Therefore, "we" said that it was an "accessory crime"
for "the violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act of Chinese".
I said the reason for this crime was "accessory" in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.
Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act is the administrative disposition
of the Minister of Justice "Revocation of status of residence". So he insisted that it was not "criminal punishment."
Police and prosecutors have sentenced me to "imprisonment",
saying "you should plead guilty to general theory, not the logic of law."
My "not guilty" was proved at the 192nd Extraordinary Diet Session on November 18, 2016
by the "Law to Partially Amend the Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act".
Chinese who have been punished for violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act are also "not guilty"
under Article 14 "Equality before the Law" of the Constitution.
If the employer who illegally hired a Chinese is "not guilty",
the Chinese who worked is "not guilty".
This violates international law prohibiting the "arbitrary" punishment of foreigners.
Governments of the international community, everyone!
Please! In addition to rejecting the extradition treaty with Japan,
please "request" the Japanese government to "govern under the law" and become a "nation that respects human rights."
Part 1 I asked the international community for help by letter or email.
The "ambassadors to Japan" in some countries promised "support".
So the Japanese government realized that it was an illegal punishment.
So the Diet "revised" the Immigration Control Act so that it could be punished.
The 192nd Extraordinary Diet Session.
On November 18, 2016, the "Act for Partial Revision of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act" was enacted at the 192nd Extraordinary Diet Session
and promulgated on the 28th of the same month (Act No. 88 of 2016). ..
The revised law applies to those who have obtained a status of residence through false application as penalties!
The purpose of the revised law.
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties
for persons who obtained a status of residence by false application (former law Articles 70 and 74-6).
The Japanese government carried out the same illegal punishment from 2014 to 2015.
I punished the staff and diplomats of the Embassy of Philippi in Japan for the same "crime of support" as I did.
Filipinos who worked in "landscape shops" were also illegally punished.
Employers who illegally hire Filipinos are not punished under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
To all the governments of the international community,
unless the Japanese government is "condemned" at the United Nations,
the number of victims in the world will only increase.
I will write tomorrow, too.
The amendment to the Immigration Control Act in January 2017 states
that "I am not guilty" as the reason for the amendment.
Reason: Amend from "cannot be punished" to "can be punished".
It is a false charge. Thank you to everyone in the international community.
However, the Japanese government has not yet apologized. See below for the indictment. (Japanese)
Please contact us if you have any questions.