Submitted additional material to the United Nations Human Rights Council (ohchr).
I read an article that translated the coverage of Agence France-Presse.
The arrest and imprisonment of "Carlos Ghosn" violates Articles 9, 10 and 11 of the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights" and Articles 9, 10 and 14 of the "International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights". It was taken up by the UN Working Group because it violated it. "I" also submitted "additional materials" from "this point of view".
Japan has not ratified the "reporting system".
However, Mr. Ghosn's lawyers, Francois Jimerley and Jessica Finnell's "complaints" to the Japanese government were deliberated in the "working group."
If so, my "complaints" should also be dealt with by the "Working Group on Arbitrary Detention". Please help us to do so!Please help the Government of the United Kingdom treat this issue "fairly" in the United Nations Human Rights Council.
I can't "attach a file" because there are a lot of materials.
As for the materials, "Documents for submitting complaints" has been uploaded below, so please download it.
2021-02-03: Dear Sir,
I sought support from the "judiciary administration" in the "relief of human rights"
in the "immigration law violation case". When I asked the Ministry of Justice in writing,
"I cannot answer individual cases."
I consulted with the Human Rights Bureau of the Ministry of Justice.
We do not accept consultations on "cases that are contested in court".
We asked the "Human Rights Relief Committee" of the Japan Federation of Bar Associations for support.
"The Japan Federation of Bar Associations does not have the" power "to support you."
This is Japan's "judicial administration" in "isolated state".
It is truly an "authoritarian" national system.
I expected the United States to participate in the "TPP".
However, Japan's "isolation" will continue as the United States does not participate.
"TPP" without the participation of the United States is meaningless.
Please make an agreement between Japan and the United States!
The liberalization of "trade in services" inevitably means the liberalization
of the movement of people (people) and capital (money).
Participation in the TPP will require the establishment of conditions for lawyers,
doctors and other professionals with national qualifications to freely work
in each other's countries as a liberalization of the movement of people.
Naturally, lawyers will be liberalized.
After the Supreme Court's decision,
I showed a "bill of indictment" to a Communist Party lawyer
and consulted with him about a "request for retrial."
Lawyers say that the "crime" of the "bill of indictment" can be changed.
This "indictment = bill of indictment" is "decisio".
It cannot be changed. It is not my role for her to teach her her law.
I consulted with a Democratic lawyer by providing materials in advance.
She said the lawyer said, "Because the criminal perpetrator is a" labor sentence ",
a" support crime "is established."
These lawyers were advising "political parties" in the "legislation" of "collusion crimes."
In order to democratize Japan's "judicial administration," liberalization of "lawyers" is necessary.
Western countries should ask Japan to liberalize the "service industry."
Part 1 "I" explains Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act and tells the lawyer.
The Chinese "submitting false documents" is not a crime.
Therefore, he says that "accessory crime" cannot be applied to the fact that he is not guilty.
He said something more scary.
The lawyer says that everyone who graduated
from the "Judiciary Training Institute" does the same thing as I did.
The Japanese bar exam only memorizes "problem trends and countermeasures".
Article 64. Unless otherwise specified,
a person who incites a crime or an accessory who should be detained
or charged only with a fine shall not be punished.
Article 64 A person who induces
or aids a crime subject only to misdemeanor imprisonment without work
or a petty fine shall not be punished for a crime except as otherwise specially provided.
Lawyers do not understand "the logic of law" at all.
The revised Immigration Control Act proves that the person
who provided the "false documents" to a foreigner was not guilty.
On November 18, 2016, the "Law to partially revise the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act" was enacted at the 192nd Extraordinary Diet Session.
Penalties apply not only to those who facilitated the execution
of the prescribed acts for the purpose of profit, that is, not only brokers,
but also application agents such as employers, lawyers,
administrative scriveners and school staff
who participated in false applications ( Immigration Control Act Article 74-6)
TPP: Impact of liberalization of service fields on four fields
I will write tomorrow, too.
The amendment of the Immigration Control Act in January 2017 states
that "I am not guilty" as the reason for the amendment.
Reason: Amend from "cannot be punished" to "can be punished".
It is a false charge. Thank you to everyone in the international community.
However, the Japanese government has not yet apologized. See below for the indictment. (Japanese)
Part 2 Please see the following for "false charges" of "crime of support
for violation of immigration law" in 2010
Please contact us if you have any questions.