<Public mail> Please help me!
Dear Sir or Madam, UK Prime Minister Teliza Mei, January 19, 2018
According to BusinessJournal, "Prime Minister Shinzo Abe announced to the reporters on Monday 12 that the Korean government requested the Japanese government to take new measures in the December 2015 Japan-South Korea agreement over the issue of comfort women's troops "The agreement is a promise between the country and the country, it is an international and universal principle to keep this, it is impossible to accept that the Korean side unilaterally seeks further measures."
I think that most Japanese citizens support the remarks of Abe mentioned above. As I mentioned earlier, I am Japanese, so heartily, I feel the same as Prime Minister Abe. Japan is right and Korea is wrong.
However, as Mr. Aki Sonosaki said, "Prime Minister Shinzo Akira" World and Japanese identity "official document not even official document Japan-South Korea agreement, Prime Minister Abe criticizing Korea's review is more abnormal and insane" I am insane.
Many of the people believe that the Japan-ROK agreement is a treaty. But there is no official document. Japanese Diet members do not regard this as a problem. I can not keep up with this idea.
It may not be a Japanese anymore. It is meaningless to say in such Japanese that it says to preserve the treaties signed in writing and written, or to keep the laws established in the Diet. In case
In my affair, the police officer said, "Accept crimes in general theory." This is the substance of judicial jurisdiction in Japan, I am sending e-mails to the Diet members everyday, and to the President of the lamp Everyone is ignoring, there are no members of the Diet who would like to condemn in the National Assembly Please please know the substance of Japan!
Prime Minister Teliza May, "Please help me, please make Japan a country governed under the law."
There are two things I really want to say in terms of human rights issues in Japan!
1. It is a fact that Chinese and Philippines worked other than the status of residence,
The Immigration Control Law is a provision that equally dispose of workers and those who work.
In this case, only foreigners who worked outside the status of residence were criminalized.
We have not disposed of those who worked illegally (employers) with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act (illegal employment promotion crime).
If so, the alien worked is innocent.
This is equal under the law, it is the rule of international law.
There is no assistant to any illegal work if it is.
2. For me and staff of the Philippine Embassy,
Contents As providing a false employment contract, for the illegal workers'
I applied the crime assistance crime, but it is a mistake in applying law.
Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents,
It is administrative punishment, Immigration Law 22-4 Article 4 (Cancellation of Status of Residence).
The donor will assist the sin, but it can not be criminalized under the provisions of the criminal code.
It is a violation of basic human rights violation.
Applicable crimes are special officials abuse of their own authority and false charges.
Many victims of foreigners are also occurring today.
Please let ICC investigate! Please also take up the agenda in the UN, G7, G20 and others.
Documents to be submitted to ICC are below.
His Excellency, Terrysa May, Gambare! And please help us! Best regards.