Dear Sirs International people.
End of Year & New Year's Day January 05, 2019:
If the ICC ignores the "Rome Statute or ICC Regulation",
the international community should withdraw from the ICC at all.
Dear Sir, Please "listen" to the summary of the ICC complaint. In case
In April 2011, I will be "Judgment" of "1 year and a half of labor punishment"
and "fine 1 million yen".
I appealed to the Tokyo High Court but was rejected in October 2011.
I appealed to the "Supreme Court" but was rejected
in February 2012 for the reason that "appeal" due to mistakes
in the applicable law is not subject to deliberation under the Criminal Procedure Act ".
And I was "imprisoned" in March 2012.
And I was released from prison in March 2013 with complete termination of sentence.
As an accomplice, KinGungaku acknowledged the crime,
It was not sentenced to imprisonment but suspended execution,
and was forcibly repatriated to China at the end of October 2010.
By the time of August 2010,
the Chinese four people were fined for a year and a half due to labor charges,
It was forcibly repatriated to China with sentence of "execution suspension".
In case
Article 14 of the Constitution (Equality under the Law) paragraph 1,
"All citizens are equal under the law, politically,
economically or socially by race, creed, gender, social status or entrance In relation,
it will not be discriminated. "
Article 31 of the Constitution, "No person shall be deprived of its life
or freedom unless undertaken by the law, and no other punishment can be imposed.
The "International Covenant on Citizenship and Political Rights" ratified by Japan
Article 2 (1) (3),
Article 4 (1),
Article 5 (2),
Article 9 (1) (5),
Article 13, Article 14 (6),
Article 15 (1),
Article 16,
Article 17,
Article 26,
Judicial officials are clearly in breach of the above and we are innocent.
This is "False charges"
I will continue on tomorrow.
I will continue until you understand.
I've "claimed" two things in this case.
1. Foreigners conducted "illegal work" other than "qualification for residence".
But a foreigner is innocent.
Only foreigners were punished with Article 70 of the Immigration Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of illegal work with the Immigration Act 73-2
(a crime that promotes illegal employment).
However, Japan's judiciary "disposses" only foreigners and does not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And it violates international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.
If "an employer who illegally employed" is innocent,
"a foreigner who worked illegally" is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes of criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.
2. "Prosecution letter" "as a reason for crime,
It points out the Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no criminal penalty against this.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" by "Minister of Justice"
and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "crime to support other crimes of criminal law" can not be applied.
The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
But "crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/
There are many victims in the world.
Please "support" a lot of victims with your courage and justice.
I am asking the Japanese government to "recover honor"
and "compensate for victims" of the victims.
Sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
