<Public mail> # metoo Human rights victim!
Dear Sirs International people.
Sunday version: January 27, 2019:
Philippine country is not a beggar.
The Philippine government should protest against human rights violations in Japan.
The country of the Philippines is a major country with a population of 100 million people.
Philippines, have courage!
Dear sirs. Yomiuri Shimbun The morning edition article dated February 20, 2015 is the same as below.
Four Chinese in violation of Immigration Control Act
(activity outside the status of qualification) in June 2010.
It is all the same as the case incident of "me and kingungaku" who was convicted of the support.
The Immigration Control Act is "equality under the law"
and it is a system of law which does not violate international law.
Illegal foreign workers are criminalized
under "(Immigration Law Article 70 1, 4, 19 1 1 1) illegal employment crime".
A person who illegally employed a foreigner is criminalized
under the crime of promoting illegal employment (Article 2 of Article 73).
Filipinos who have worked illegally are also acquitted if they do not dispose of their employers.
This is the logic of law and international law.
Arbitrary punishment for foreigners is a violation of international law.
The prosecution has illegally disposed of "Embassy officials and diplomats" in this case.
The crime of falsifying "conducting specific activities"
and obtaining a status of residence
with false documents is "Revocation of Status of Residence"
in Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Control Act.
Disposition is "only" that the Minister of Justice cancels "status of residence".
According to amendment of Immigration Control Law in July 2010, "embassy staff"
and "diplomat" who provided false documents are only subject to the "cancellation
of status of residence" disposition. There is no criminal disposition.
However, the prosecution creates false crimes.
Punishable under Article 60 and Article 62 of the Penal Code.
The causal relationship (reason) for crime reasons is crazy.
The Filipino received a false employment contract.
The Filipinos were able to acquire the status of residence
by submitting false employment contracts.
The Filipinos were able to live in Japan.
Filipinos were able to live in Japan, so they could do illegal work.
Suppose that they received 'qualification for residence' in 'contract of false employment'.
But if they do work within the scope of "status of residence" it is not "illegal work".
Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act and Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act are "pairs".
Employers who illegally employ foreigners should be punished.
The Japanese government's "law of ethics" is crazy.
The Philippine government should request the Japanese government to restore honor.
I will continue with next week.
Please understand Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act.
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Full text is below.
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=1934&vm&re
This is the reason for the crime pointed out in the indictment
The prosecution says that we did "aiding and abetting"
of Article 22-4-4 "Revocation of Status of Residence" Immigration Act.
This punishment is the cancellation of "status of residence".
(Revocation of Status of Residence)
Article 22-4 A Minister of Justice may obtain a foreign national who resides
in Japan with the status of residence of the appended table 1 or the upper row
of appended table 2 under the recognition of a refugee under paragraph 1 of Article 61-2 ),
If any of the facts listed in each of the following items is found,
the applicant may revoke the status of residence that the alien actually has
under the procedure specified by the applicable Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice.
1 omitted
2 omission
3 omitted
※ ※ ※ ※
"A bill of indictment" is "posting" 4 below. It's crazy.
Documents submitted to the "Tokyo Immigration Bureau" by the Chinese people fall
under the following 4.
The prosecution "points out" that we have "offered" this document "false document" to Chinese people.
4 In addition to what is listed in the preceding three items,
documents containing misrepresented documents (certificates
and misrepresentations stipulated in Article 7-2, paragraph 1,
which was issued by submission or presentation of documents with misstatements
or drawings Including a visa received by a passport
by submitting or presenting a certain document or drawing of the same) or a seal
or the like of landing permission by submission or presentation of drawings.
5 omitted
(Forced deportation)
(Deportation)
Article 24 For a foreign national who falls under any of the following items,
it is possible to force the eviction from Japan by the procedure prescribed in the next chapter.
* The following was added in 2010 July.
(3) Invalidly illegally giving a certificate
under the provisions of the preceding paragraph 1 or 2 illegally to another foreigner,
a seal of the landing permit (including the record
under the provisions of Article 9 paragraph 4) or permission,
Forgery or alteration of documents or drawings, creation of false documents or drawings,
forgery or forgery or creation of documents or drawings
for the purpose of allowing permission for landing pursuant to the provisions
of the clause or permission under the provisions of Section 1 or 3 of the next chapter A person
who exercises, possesses, or provides for altered documents or drawings
or false documents or drawings, or suggests or helps these acts
There is no "good abduction" or "bad abduction" in abduction / confinement. Help me!
There are many victims around the world.
Please support "Appeal to ICC".
The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
In case
The above translation documents are inaccurate,
so please contact us by e-mail.
Sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
