To President Trump
At the G20 Osaka Summit in June,
I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution"
regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act".
I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest
and detention."
Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone.
2019-06-19:Dear Sir, I wrote yesterday. The Minister of Justice issued "status of residence".
However, it is not uncommon for the Foreign Minister not to issue a visa.
Prosecutors think "status of residence status" = "Visa". It's crazy.
Today I will explain "Renewal and Change of Status of Residence".
You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4
Part 1. If a Chinese resident in Japan changes "status of residence"
from "Study Abroad" to "Technology", etc., or if "Period Renewal" is performed,
the Chinese person will apply directly.
For example, when you enter a job,
the company gives the Chinese person an employment contract,
reasons for employment, a registered copy of the company, a statement of accounts,
and a company guide.
These are described in the "instructions from the section manager",
which is distributed at the Immigration Bureau. (Not a law)
When it comes to from November to December.
The Chinese himself will go to the Immigration Office to submit a status change application form,
a resume, a reason for residence status change, a photo,
a reply postcard, a registered stamp, etc. and "documents received from the company".
In January, there may be a fact confirmation call to the company from Immigration.
As it is a factual investigation, it is the same as the case of invitation.
An example of a Chinese employee who joined L company.
He is the story of the company that took the exam before "L company".
Because the "seal" of the "Employment Contract" is not the "sign of the representative director",
the "immigration staff" conducted the "fact investigation".
The Immigration officials dismissed the application knowing
that the employment contract was a false lie.
The cause was that the "system manager" had created a "fake" employment contract.
It is a violation of Immigration Control Act 22-4- (4).
It does not make it a "case".
After that, you will receive a postcard
(reply postcard) of the status of residence change (update).
Please come to Immigration with your diploma.
What to bring is passport ....
When I graduate, I will go to immigration with a diploma (in kind).
You will then be given a "Visa" on your passport in exchange for a postcard,
confirming your diploma.
In the case of renewal, if you go to the immigration office with only a postcard,
you will receive a "Visa" for your passport.
※ The exchange of "immigration control"
with the person is not known to the company unless the person reports.
I will continue tomorrow.
Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.
1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).
However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".
If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.
2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.
Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.
The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
My information ***************************************************
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
***************************************************
