from the Minister of Justice as "technology" or "humanities / international"
It is clear that if you work within the scope of "status of residence" of "technology"
or "humanities / international",
it will not result in illegal work (activity outside the status of qualification).
Therefore "Contract of false employment" is nothing to do with "illegal work".
Japanese judicial can not even understand this logic.
Dear Sirs, I am Japanese. My argument is that the application of "crime to support
other crimes" of "criminal law" is a criminal act for the following reasons.
"Name of sin" is "False accusation" of "criminal law"
and is "crime of abusing the authority of special public servants."
It is the continuation of the previous day.
1. The aid for assisting illegal employment is stipulated in Article 2,
Article 73 of the Immigration Act, "Special Law", "Crime of Promoting Illegal Employment."
I and KinGungaku have not violated the provision of Article 2 of Article 73
of the Immigration Act.
※ "Reason for crime" written in the indictment is the support
of "Administrative Punishment" described in Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Control Act.
For the act corresponding to this, the "status of residence" will be "canceled"
after obtaining "status of residence".
It is not a criminal act. This is "arbitrary" violation of applicable law.
No employer who hired the Chinese has been punished.
It is not disposed of as "illegal employment promotion crime" stipulated
by Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act.
If so, it is "equal under the law" not to punish the Chinese who were hired
and forced to do illegal work. Therefore they are "innocent".
If so, that there is no supporter of illegal labor, including me.
2. Next, the judge says the reason for applying "crime to support other crimes"
of the "Penal Code". The fact that handed over to the Chinese "a contract of employment
whose content is false" says that "acquisition" of "qualification
for residence" was made "easy". But it is "illegal".
Conditions that give "status of residence" are not "regulated" by law.
The "condition" to be given is "unpublished"
and the Minister of Justice "grants" at "discretion".
Therefore, I can not say that "granting" of "status of residence" was made "easy".
Suppose, for example, you submit "Contract of Employment with False Content"
to Immigration Bureau and obtain "Qualification of Residence".
Suppose this fact turns out after giving "qualification for residence".
This correspondence is "cancellation of status of residence" as stipulated
in Article 4 to 4 of Immigration Act 22. "Illegal employment" is "separate".
Suppose, for example, you submit "Contract of Employment
with False Content" to Immigration Bureau and obtain "Qualification of Residence".
And it is clear that if you work within the scope of "status of residence" of "technology",
"humanities / international",
it will not result in illegal labor (activity outside the status of qualification).
Therefore, there is nothing to do with the fact of obtaining "qualification for residence"
and the fact of "illegal labor".
If foreigners can live in Japan, allegations of "causal relationship"
of "judgment letter" that foreigners do "crime" are crazy.
The international community should not forgive Japanese judiciary.
This is a serious "human rights violation".
Please confirm the fact with "judgment document".
I will continue on tomorrow.
Ignoring the rule under the law Can the Japanese government be an alliance?
Is not it betrayal?
President Donald Trump 's reply encourages me.
President Donald J. Trump believes the strength of our American people
and their willingness to stay informed and get involved.
President Trump appreciates you taking the time to reach out.
The material is below.