<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!
To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister
2019-01-24: The "declining" begins to appear in the world hegemony
by the United States is the "terrorist attack on the United States" occurred in 2001,
followed by the "Afghan war" and the "Iraq war It will be.
This incident in my case occurred in Japan in 2010.
Dear sirs. Prosecutors illegally abused their own authority around June 16, 2010.
I guess no crime is guessed.
I have not committed a criminal act.
the prosecutor says that it is a crime to have provided the Chinese
with "false documents" described in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act.
In other words, "false document" is "document of contract of employment with false content".
However, even if you obtain "qualification for residence"
by submitting "Documents of false employment contract" described
in Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Control Act, you will not be "punished".
If it is true, the Minister of Justice will only cancel the "status of residence".
Even if you obtain "qualifications for residence" in "Contract documents for false employment contracts",
if you work within the scope of "status of residence",
it is not a violation of immigration law (activity outside your status of qualification) .
I was "under arrest / detention" at the Tsukishima police station.
Prosecutor illegally made a "request for detention".
And the prosecutor got illegally "Detention letter".
The reason for detention is a crime of supporting "violation of immigration law
(illegal work due to activities other than qualification)".
Prosecutors abused their own authority.
By "Detention letter" the prosecutor robbed me of my "Freedom of decision making".
The prosecutor conducted an illegal "arrest / confinement"
and conducted interrogation despite having no obligation to me.
Therefore, the act of public prosecutor officer falls under Article 194 of the Criminal Code,
"Crime that a special civil servant abused its authority".
It is a crime of a police officer, a prosecutor,
a judge in Japan. The prosecution still ignores it.
It is a villainous crime more than the abduction of Japanese nationals in North Korea.
In the Constitution of Japan, judges are not bound by any constitution.
However, it is imposed on the Constitution of Japan the obligation to observe the Constitution
and the law. In other words,
the judgment that violates the law is a crime.
Even this, can you not understand, or are you not having justice?
Please stand up to make the world a society where freedom,
democracy and human rights are protected.
I will continue on tomorrow.
I will continue until you understand.
I "appeal" the two things.
It is "international" human rights violation by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "honor recovery and compensation" will be done.
1. Foreigners conducted "illegal work" other than "qualification for residence".
But a foreigner is innocent.
Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of illegal work with the Immigration Act 73-2
(a crime that promoted illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary "disposal" only foreigners, but they do not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And it violates international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.
If an employer who illegally employed a foreigner is innocent,
a foreigner who has worked illegally is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes of criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.
2. The "reason for crime" to which the prosecution applies "Article 62 of the Criminal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" is as follows.
Foreigners conducted the act prescribed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act
(acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" by "Minister of Justice"
and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "Article 62 of the Penal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" can not be applied.
The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
But "crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The material is below.
There are many victims in the world.
Please "salvage" a lot of "victims" with "courage and justice".
I request the Japanese government to "recover honor"
and "compensate for the victim" of the victim.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
Please contact us if you have any questions.