Japan's Justice in the Dark

Please support so that Japan will be governed under the law, fundamental human rights will be protected, and it will become a country complying with international law

#MeToo Human rights victim! To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister 2019-02-01: It clearly violates the following provision of "International Covenant on Citizenship and Political Rights" ratified by Japan. Article 2 (1) (3), Article 4 (1), Article 5

<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister

2019-02-01: It clearly violates the following provision of "International Covenant
on Citizenship and Political Rights" ratified by Japan. Article 2 (1) (3),
Article 4 (1), Article 5 (2), Article 9 (1) (5), Article 13, Article 14 (6),
Article 15 ), Article 16, Article 17, Article 26.

Dear sirs. Prosecutor in charge of trial received handover from prosecutor in charge of interview.
Prosecutors illegally abused their authority until around June 24,
2011 from around late July 2010.
I can not guess any crime.
Despite the fact that I was not committing a crime, the prosecutor abused his authority.

The prosecutor "pointed out" that he handed out "false documents" described
in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act, to the Chinese.
The public prosecutor said the act
by which the Minister of Justice "cancels the status of residence" is a crime.
In this case, the Chinese only receive cancellation of "status of residence".
It is not a criminal disposition.
The logic of law is crazy.

The prosecutor made a "trial" without any obligation to me.

The reason for the crime described in the "indictment" is the act of support
of Article 22-4-4 "Revocation of Status of Residence" of the Immigration Act.
Disposition under Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act is a disposition to rescind
the "status of residence" issued by the Minister of Justice, not criminal disposition.
Therefore, I can not dispose me.
Even if you obtain a status of residence by false documents,
if you work within the scope of your status of residence,
you will not become "illegal work outside your status".
It is embarrassing, false prosecution out of the logic of law.
Therefore, the acts of the prosecutors fall under the crime of Article 172 "False complaint"
of the Penal Code.

In Japan, a "private trial" ignoring such laws is being held today as well.

It is a crime of police officers, prosecutors and judges in Japan.
The prosecution still ignores it.
It is a villainous crime more than the abduction of Japanese nationals in North Korea.
In the Constitution of Japan, judges are not constrained by anyone in the Constitution.
However, judges are obliged to observe the Constitution
and the law according to the constitution of the Japanese Constitution.
In other words, the judgment that violates the law is a crime.

Even this, can you not understand, or are you having no justice?
Please stand up to make the world a society where freedom,
democracy and human rights are protected.
I will continue with next week.
I will continue until you understand.

God will always support 'justice'.
I certainly believe that justice is "wins".

I "appeal" the two things.
It is "international" human rights violation by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "honor recovery and compensation" will be done.

1. Foreigners conducted "illegal work" other than "qualification for residence".
But a foreigner is innocent.

Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are "cause-and-effect relationships" of illegal work with the Immigration Act 73-2
(a crime that promotes illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary "disposal" only foreigners,
but they do not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And we are in violation of international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.

If an employer who illegally employed a foreigner is innocent,
a foreigner who has worked illegally is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes of criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.

2. The "reason for crime" to which the prosecution applies "Article 62 of the Criminal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" is as follows.
Foreigners conducted the act prescribed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act
(acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" by "Minister of Justice"
and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "Article 62 of the Penal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" can not be applied.

The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
"Crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The material is below.

There are many victims in the world.
Please "salvage" a lot of "victims" with "courage and justice".
I request the Japanese government to "recover honor"
and "compensation for the victim" of the victim.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


It is open to the program below.

Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.