<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!
To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister
2019-02-04: In Japan, police officers, prosecutors, judges
and lawyers are interfering with governance by law.
Diet members are only interested in Article 9 of the Constitution.
Japan moves to judicial socialist dictatorship.
Western society is silent. It's crazy!
Dear sirs. In our acts, no crime is guessed at all.
Of course, we are not doing any criminal acts.
What the prosecutor believes on criminal grounds for indictment is not a crime under the law.
In this case, the crime pointed out
in the indictment stipulates that the immigration law is not a crime. Immigration law 22-4-4.
The Chinese got a status of residence by submitting "false document"
(a contract of employment with false content in the indictment) to the immigration office.
So, the Chinese were able to stay in Japan.
So the Chinese were able to do illegal work. Is called.
However, even if the Chinese submits a "false document" to the immigration office
and obtains the status of residence, it is not a criminal punishment.
"Status of Residence" will be canceled only by the Minister of Justice.
Even if you acquire the status of residence with "false documents",
it is clear that if you work within the scope of your status of residence,
you will not become "illegal work outside your status of residence".
Prosecutors in Japan make crimes for reasons that are completely different from these laws.
The correct law enforcement against illegal labor is as follows.
Foreigners who have carried out "illegal work" will be disposed of
under Article 70 of the "Immigration and Refugee Recognition Act
(hereinafter referred to as" Immigration Act ")" illegal employment crime ".
Employers who illegally employ foreigners are disposed of
under Article 2 of the Immigration Act 73 "Sins that promote illegal work".
The Diet legislates to criminalize both parties equally.
The Constitution of Japan.
"International law" (International Covenant on Citizenship and Political Rights)
forbidding the disposal of foreigners arbitrarily.
However, in reality, "a person who illegally hired a foreigner" has not been disposed of
under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act as "illegal employment promotion crime".
Only "foreigners who did illegal work" are criminalized
under Article 70 of the Immigration Act and "crime of illegal labor"
to "exile to foreign countries".
This is contrary to international law which prohibited foreign discrimination arbitrarily.
It also violates equality under the law of the Constitution of Japan.
Even this, can you not understand, or are you having no justice?
Please stand up to make the world a society where freedom,
democracy and human rights are protected.
I will continue with next week.
I will continue until you understand.
God will always support 'justice'.
I certainly believe that justice is "wins".
I "appeal" the two things.
It is "international" human rights violation by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "honor recovery and compensation" will be done.
1. Foreigners conducted "illegal work" other than "qualification for residence".
But a foreigner is innocent.
Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are "cause-and-effect relationships" of illegal work with the Immigration Act 73-2
(a crime that promotes illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary "disposal" only foreigners, but they do not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And we are in violation of international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.
If an employer who illegally employed a foreigner is innocent,
a foreigner who has worked illegally is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes of criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.
2. The "reason for crime" to which the prosecution applies "Article 62 of the Criminal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" is as follows.
Foreigners conducted the act prescribed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act
(acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" by "Minister of Justice"
and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "Article 62 of the Penal Code, (crime of supporting other crimes)" can not be applied.
The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
"Crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The material is below.
There are many victims in the world.
Please "salvage" a lot of "victims" with "courage and justice".
I request the Japanese government to "recover honor"
and "compensation for the victim" of the victim.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
Please contact us if you have any questions.