<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!
To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister
2019-02-05: Last December,
South Korea "Navy destroyer irradiated P-1 patrol aircraft
of Japan Maritime Self Defense Force several times with fire control radar several times.
It is on the verge of war.
Western society is "silent". That's crazy!
Dear sirs. Prosecutors will not dispose of "employers who caused foreigners to engage
in illegal work" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act as "crime that promoted illegal work".
in that case,
It is "logic of law" not to dispose of foreigners who have carried out "illegal labor"
under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act. (Foreigners are not guilty).
If so, of course, there is no promoter of illegal labor.
This is governance under the law and respecting fundamental human rights.
To do this is compliance with international law.
Previously, employers who illegally employed foreigners have not been disposed of
under the Immigration Act 73-2, "Sins that promote illegal employment".
And only foreigners who did "illegal work" were "banished from the country"
by "imprisonment of illegal labor" in Article 70 of the Immigration Act
and "fined". This is an international law violation.
Prosecutors and others conducted more vicious "criminal acts" in "incident
of promotion of violation of immigration law" which occurred in 2010.
Prosecutors and the like illegally "creates" a third party's "promoter" on behalf
of "a crime of promoting illegal employment".
The prosecutors dispose of third parties to make them appear as if they were disposed of equally,
and made foreigners who carried out illegal work "a crime of labor"
and "expelled them outside the country".
In case
"I and KinGungaku" who provided "a document of contract of employment" to Chinese by a third party.
"I and Kin Gungaku" is not a crime that promoted illegal employment "
of Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
but a" disposition of obtaining a status of residence
by submitting false documents "in Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Control Act The reason
for crime was that he supported him.
This disposition is to cancel the status of residence of a foreign national.
It is "Administrative Punishment" by the Minister of Justice.
And "crime of support" of Article 60, Article 62 of the Penal Code can not be applied.
Prosecutors, however, ignored the "logic of law".
Prosecutors and others abused the "crime of support"
of Article 60 and Article 62 of the Penal Code against the Immigration Act 70
(crime of unlawful labor) which is not related to Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act.
It is a crazy judiciary that is completely out of "logic of law".
Even this, can you not understand, or are you having no justice?
Please stand up to make the world a society where freedom,
democracy and human rights are protected.
I will continue with next week.
I will continue until you understand.
God will always support 'justice'.
I certainly believe that justice is "wins".
I "appeal" the two things.
It is "international" human rights violation by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "honor recovery and compensation" will be done.
1. Foreigners conducted "illegal work" other than "qualification for residence".
But a foreigner is innocent.
Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are "cause-and-effect relationships" of illegal work with the Immigration Act 73-2
(a crime that promotes illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary "disposal" only foreigners,
but they do not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And we are in violation of international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.
If an employer who illegally employed a foreigner is innocent,
a foreigner who has worked illegally is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes of criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.
2. The "reason for crime" to which the prosecution applies "Article 62 of the Criminal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" is as follows.
Foreigners conducted the act prescribed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act
(acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" by "Minister of Justice"
and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "Article 62 of the Penal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" can not be applied.
The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
"Crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Please "salvage" a lot of "victims" with "courage and justice".
I request the Japanese government to "recover honor"
and "compensation for the victim" of the victim.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/
Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
