To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister
2019-04-24:Dear Sirs, France is a "super-educated society".
The “super-educated society” creates the gap between rich and poor.
France is a free and equal country.
It is necessary to repeat the career in the actual work
and to make a "payoff" based on performance.
Part 1. Suppose that all the French people have obtained a doctoral degree.
Then we know what the French will do next.
French are "people" who love to create "differences".
French people think that they will "make" the higher "degree".
You can not get a "career" with just your academic background.
I have proposed to build a "special zone" in the "Sunday edition".
However, the unemployment rate of France now is 10%.
There is no "power" to accept refugees and immigrants.
First of all, the unemployment rate should be around 4% like Japan.
Many French companies should be "sound" for that.
If a company is healthy, sales and profits will increase.
In order to do that, it is necessary for employees to have the "willingness to work".
In the Japanese example, it is "Kaizen" of "Toyota Motor".
Not only Toyota Motor, but most companies in Japan are doing Kaizen activities.
"Kaizen" = "Improvement".
Every employee is making suggestions for "improvement" of work every day.
Kaizen will benefit the company as a result.
If the company makes a profit, the employee's "monthly salary" and "bonus" will increase.
The employment form of the Japanese company is "lifetime employment".
The raise is "seniority rank".
For example, a high school graduate of 18 years old pays a monthly salary of 160,000 yen.
If the regular pay increase is 20,000 yen,
then the 22-year-old employee who graduates with a bachelor's degree is 240,000 yen a month.
It will be 240,000 yen when the 18-year-old high school graduate becomes 22 years old.
The job does the same job.
So it is difficult to differentiate work by academic background.
Japan will build up a career with work experience.
Even in Japan, there is "a little" discrimination by academic background.
However, if he gets a job title even though he has no ability,
his subordinates will be dissatisfied.
Then his men will not do Kaizen.
Then the company will be in the red.
France is a "top down" that issues commands from top to bottom.
However, Japan is a "bottom-up" proposal from the bottom to the top.
The root of the difference between Japanese companies and French companies is here.
This story will continue tomorrow
Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.
1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).
However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".
If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes
in criminal law" against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.
2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.
Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" have no causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.
The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Nagano Yoshihiro
PS:
The UK should leave the EU unconditionally, respect the referendum and show the example of the democratic nation to the world.
Since many foreigners have been sacrificed in the Immigration Control Violation Case, please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."
It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/
Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
