To President Trump
At the Japan-US Summit Meeting at the end of May and the G20 Osaka Summit in June,
I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution"
regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act".
I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest
Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone.
2019-05-28:Dear Sirs, I would like to say to President McLon,
I also accept 100% of the "bill of indictment".
However, the reason for the crime described in "bill of indictment" is "innocence".
It is clearly defined in the Immigration Act 22-4- (4).
Carlos Ghosn is also forced to "offender".
Part 1. It is a "judgment document" of "assistance.
Case" of "the immigration law violation case" of 2010.
Again, the "judgment document" will be written in Japanese in order to be accurately stated.
Everybody, please translate correctly.
I have stated that it is acceptable to admit the "pointing out matter"
of the "crime fact" of the "claim."
However, Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Control Law,
which the prosecution considers as a crime fact, claims that it is not a crime.
"Lawyers" asserts innocence from "another point of view".
However, I insist that "the fact of the crime to point out" is not a crime. .
This is not a "difference of opinion".
The prosecutor's office still does not admit "error of applicable law".
I wrote an objection to the Supreme Court and mailed it.
The Supreme Court has ignored.
This is the reality of Japan.
Everyone, please understand that the "facts of crime" pointed out
in the "bill of indictment"
and the "judgment document" is Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act.
"The violation of Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Control Act is the cancellation
of the status of residence.
Please understand that it is not "crime" even if the Japanese does "assistance."
It is not possible to "exile" the Japanese.
Japan's prime minister's office, parliamentarians and political parties are incompetent.
Please understand the fact that the public prosecutor
and the judge arrest and confine the people for reasons different
from the law enacted in the Diet.
"OHCHR" and "ICC" still do not move. The international community is a human rights crisis.
I will continue tomorrow.
Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident.
My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.
1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).
However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".
If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.
2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.
Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" have no causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.
The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The documents are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
My information ***************************************************
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!