To President Trump
At the G20 Osaka Summit in June,
I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution"
regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act".
I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest
and detention."
Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone.
2019-06-13:Dear Sirs, Philippine embassy officials and diplomats do not do "illegal labor".
They were criminalized for their support of Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act.
This disposition is illegal. Therefore, it is "false charge".
You should ask the Japanese government for "restoration of honor" and compensation.
You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4
Part 1. Understand the Immigration Act Article 22-4- (4) "Cancellation of Status of Residence".
Some foreigners residing in Japan received landing permits etc.
by false or other fraudulent means,
Some foreigners residing in Japan received landing permits etc.
by false or other fraudulent means,
Or, because there are not a few things that interfere with fair immigration control,
such as illegal work without committing the status of residence status or committing a crime,
there are a number of factors that prevent illegal work.
In order to
In a partial revision of the Immigration Control Act of 2004,
the "cancellation of status of residence" (Article 22-4) system was established
(enforced on December 2 of the same year).
The Minister of Justice may cancel the status of residence held
by a foreigner if any of the following facts are found.
(1) In the case of receiving a seal of landing permission,
for example, by falsely determining the immigration examiner's decision
on landing refusal status by false or other fraudulent means.
2 False or other fraudulent means, if the activity to be conducted
in Japan is falsified and the landing permit is received.
For example, if a person who intends to do simple work
in Japan declares that he / she will carry out an activity
that falls under the status of residence of "Technology",
this item is subject to cancellation under this issue.
3 If the applicant forged a fact other than the activity
that the applicant intends to carry out
in Japan and received a seal of landing permission, etc.
For example,
a case in which the applicant misrepresents his / her career is subject to cancellation
under this issue.
4 In cases other than 1 to 3, where false documents are submitted
and you receive a seal of landing permission. In this issue, there is no requirement
for false or other fraudulent means, and the applicant is willing. I do not need to.
5 If you have not continued the activities related to your status of residence
(limited to the status of residence (Note) in the upper column of Schedule 1
of the Immigration Control Act) for more than 3 months
(but do not perform such activities. There is a good reason for that,
except in the case. In addition, in revoking the status of residence,
it is decided to hear the opinion from targeted foreigners in advance.
Note: false fake documents are now changed to false documents.
The Immigration Control Act is revised every year,
so the content and expression have changed.
I will continue tomorrow.
Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law",
it is natural to settle it by terrorism. But it's crazy.
1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).
However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".
If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.
2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.
Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.
The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
My information ***************************************************
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
***************************************************
