To President Trump
2019-06-26:Dear Sirs, Immigration seeks the authenticity of marriage to the fact of sex acts.
"Sexless marriage" is not recognized by Japanese standards.
Men and women, are you not allowed sexless by mutual agreement?
You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4
Part 1. Foreign women who have applied
for a "Japanese spouse visa" will receive a call from immigration.
She goes to immigration, thinking that she will "give me" for her spouse visa.
Immigration officials say to her "You are a fake marriage."
And she is taken to another room.
She is then taken to the Immigration Facility.
And she gets on the plane.
Is sex the only condition of marriage?
Shock news articles. Yomiuri Shimbun articles.
According to (Yomiuri Shimbun, etc. in the morning of February 20, 2015),
diplomats and officials of the Philippine embassy have been damaged.
I was surprised that it was exactly the same as my case.
It is probably based on my judgment,
but I recognized that Japan is a very dangerous "judicial state".
The content of the article was
that the embassy staff employed the Filipinos as "housekeepers of the housework"
and handed out the "employment contract documents" (the content is false) to the Filipinos.
The Philippine people applied for immigration
and acquired the "Resident Status" of "Specific Activities".
The Filipinos did not work as "housekeepers" but worked
in the "land gardening company" in Tokyo.
So, three Filipinos were accused of immigration law violation (non-qualification activity).
The police arrested embassy officials
in June 2014 for "criminal law" Article 62 "crime for supporting other crimes".
The reason for the embassy staff's crimes is the fact that they issued
the "contract documents for false employment" described
in Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act to the Philippines.
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4
please look at.
This is not a crime.
Officials at the Philippine embassy were "labor's punishment".
However, it was "deported" at (suspended sentence).
Immigration Control Act Article 22-4- (4) "A person
who submits false documents cancels the status of residence".
The Philippines have not received the cancellation of the status of residence
from the Minister of Justice for violating Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Control Act.
"The logic of law" is crazy.
If the cancellation has been received,
the embassy staff will also cancel the status of residence
In any case, "Philippine embassy staff" is "innocent."
I will continue tomorrow.
Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law",
it is natural to settle it by terrorism. But it's crazy.
1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).
However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".
If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes
in criminal law" against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.
2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.
Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship
with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.
The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
My information ******
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
