To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister
2019-07-04:Dear Sirs, I and the Philippine embassy staff and diplomats were punished
under Article 62 of the Penal Code for the Immigration Act Article 22-4- (4) as the reason
for the crime. The Philippine government does "silent approval".
The Filipinos should "provide a protest" to President Rodrigo Duterte.
You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
There are many victims of the past abroad.
It may be the first time
for the prosecution to apply the Article 62 Criminal Code Article “Sins to Support Other Crimes”
against the Immigration Act Article 70 “Unauthorized Employment Outside of Qualification”.
Prosecutors do not punish "employers"
for the Immigration Act Article 73-2 "Sins to promote illegal work".
However, only foreigners are unilaterally criminalized
by the Immigration Control Act Article 70 "Sins of unlawful labor".
A large number of foreigners have been punished for "small fines" and unilaterally "deported".
In my memory, I think it was the 2015 ruling.
A Chinese student from Osaka worked as a "night club hostess".
The prosecutors did not punish the employer
for the immigration control law Article 73-2 "Sin for promoting illegal work",
and the prosecutors "Prosecution" only for "female foreign students".
In the first instance's "judgment", women's students were "deported
from abroad" on the "cancellation of status of residence" as they were out of qualification.
Women's students made a "prosecution" in the "high court" for cancellation.
And there was an article that she had "winned".
Most foreigners do "cry oneself to sleep",
but "administrative disposition" of "cancellation
of status of residence" is also "invalid" if disputed in a trial.
It is because "the reason for victory" in this trial is punishment
that is not based on the law.
The following "rules" are not immigration laws.
We set "part-time job" of 28 hours a week.
Do not allow "labour at nightclubs".
These are not "laws" but "ministerial decrees"
which the Minister of Justice decides at discretion.
Under Article 31 of the Constitution "punishment" is only done by law.
"Legality principle" is universal.
The Japanese Constitution clearly stipulates in Articles 31 and 39.
However, there are many judges who do not understand the "legality principle".
I will continue tomorrow.
Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.
1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).
However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".
If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.
2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.
Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.
The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The documents are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
The UK should leave the EU unconditionally,
respect the referendum and show the example of the democratic nation to the world.
Since many foreigners have been sacrificed in the Immigration Control Violation Case,
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."
Please contact us if you have any questions.