To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister
2019-07-22:Dear Sirs, The Japanese Government still does not admit crimes.
I can prove with "bill of indictment" and "immigration law".
Please watch. Are the Philippine and Chinese governments "independent countries"?
You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
Please see "bill of indictment" at "site" below.
If you look at this case "bill of indictment", you can understand "error of applicable law".
Please see the "English translation" and "Japanese original" PDF.
Please be careful about the handling of personal information.
● Translation into English "Indictment letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference. Exactly, please go by yourself.
● Japanese original text "Proceeding letter letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. For English translation, please see the above "PDF".
Part 1. The “bill of indictment” first describes the facts of Article 70
“Unqualified Activities” of the Immigration Act of “Chinese”.
And then, the reason for the crime in "bill of indictment" is the fact
that it has supported the Immigration Act Article 22-4- (4).
it describes the fact that "Chinese" violated the Immigration Act Article 22-4- (4)
"Submission of False Documents".
Article 22-4- (4) of Immigration Act "Submission of false documents" is as follows.
If the Minister of Justice submits "False Documents"
and obtains "Certificate of Residence",
it stipulates that "Certificate of Residence" will be cancelled.
And it is "administrative punishment" of "forcible deportation" as "punished"
of "cancellation of status of residence" is received.
Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code can not apply to the Immigration Act 22-4- (4)
"Revocation of Status of Residence".
This case is against the Immigration Act.
The application of the law is the order of the constitution, the treaty,
the special law, and the general law.
It is ignorant, incompetent, and unsightly to "falsify" the level
of law that even amateurs around the world can understand.
If there is no "prescription" of "submission of false documents (incorrect documents)"
in Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act,
Article 60 of the Criminal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
"Ineligible Activities" It may have been possible to "apply" Article 62 "Sins to support
other crimes of the Penal Code".
However, the following "application" is "malicious" as a "law expert".
1) Disregard the law of Immigration Control Act 22-4- (4) "Revocation of Status of Residence".
2) and apply priority to Article 60
and Article 62 of the Criminal Code "Sins supporting other crimes".
In addition, in violation of this Immigration Control Act 22-4- (4)
(submission of false documents),
it is not possible to punish them under Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code
under "Sins supporting other crimes".
So, the following (A) is "implemented" on July 1, 2010 just before doing "indictment".
Therefore, this is a "conscious" "crime".
In the case of "Kin Gungaku", because you are a foreigner, you are eligible for (A).
However, because the criminal act is "before the enforcement of the law",
it is not subject to punishment according to Article 39 of the Constitution.
I think you can understand that Japan's judicial administration is "rotten".
I will continue tomorrow.
Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.
1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).
However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".
If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.
2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.
Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.
The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The documents are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
The UK should leave the EU unconditionally,
respect the referendum and show the example of the democratic nation to the world.
Since many foreigners have been sacrificed in the Immigration Control Violation Case,
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."
Please contact us if you have any questions.