To President Trump
2019-07- 29:Dear Sirs, Japan's House of Councilors Election has ended.
The voting rate was 48, 8%. Parliamentarians are no longer representative of the people.
The Japanese became smarter. If there is no candidate who wants to vote,
it will not vote by force.
Part 1. I am sending this e-mail to all of the "congressmen who publish their e-mail address".
Members of the Diet who can understand my "content of e-mail" seem to have "stress" accumulated.
But they do not have the courage to ask the government for a solution.
So he sends me the following email.
"The following is the contents of the message"
As you forgot "Public reply", I will resend the proposal. Is it dementia?
Please stop the method of sending e-mail without getting "Acceptance"
by collecting "email address to be published". Before "telling" the value of mail content,
it is a "lack of common sense" act.
Such "mail delivery" should be stopped.
We hope that we will recruit “city council members”, “prefectural assembly members”,
“congress members”, who acknowledge and agree with the value of email content,
and send them only to them.
On 2019/07/22 4:17, Yasuhiro Nagano wrote:
> Dear Sirs, Politicians
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
> If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
> The US government should claim for the restoration and redress of American honor.
Here is my reply:
The e-mail address is "collected" on the "public homepage".
Publishing your email address means to "accept" your email reception.
It is "within the range" of "common sense" to send mail to public mail
If the "congressman" does not "accept" the "email address" should not be disclosed.
For the "member of the Diet" where you do not need the received mail,
you only need to request the sender to "stop sending mail".
It is "no common sense" if "send mail" is performed even if "send mail" is requested.
Why does this "member of the Diet" not require "stop sending of mail"? "
I can not understand the "common sense" of Japanese parliamentarians.
This is a worldwide manner.
I think you can understand that the "quality" of "member of the Diet" in Japan is "the rotten state".
I will continue to tomorrow.
Please see "bill of indictment" at "site" below.
If you look at this case "bill of indictment", you can understand "error of applicable law".
Please see the "English translation" and "Japanese original" PDF.
Please be careful about the handling of personal information.
● Translation into English "Indictment letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference. Exactly, please go by yourself.
● Japanese original text "Proceeding letter letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. For English translation, please see the above "PDF".
You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism. But it's crazy.
1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
(a crime that promotes unlawful work).
However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".
If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines, and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.
2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act on the basis
of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.
Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4 (Acquisition of status of residence
by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60 and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" have no causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.
The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The documents are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
My information ******
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!