To President Trump
2019-08-22:Dear Sir,
South Korea's anti-Japan movement will end.
The South Korean government has proposed unification of the Korean Peninsula
in order to take North Korea's nuclear missiles,
but the North Korean government has read “South Korea's Strategy”.
The “destroy” of “GSOMIA” in South Korea goes to “self-destruction”.
I can be strong if you "spread" this.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
Part 1. Three of the Philippine who worked illegally should be acquitted
because the "gardening company" that caused "illegal labor" has not been "punished".
In addition, diplomats and embassy officials who have made false employment contracts
and handed them to the Philippines are subject to the following disposals according
to the Immigration Law, which was established in July 2010.
1) If three people have been disposed of under “Immigration Status”
of Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law,
(1) “Cancellation of status of residence”.
This is done by the Minister of Justice delivering a “Notification of Cancellation
of Status of Residence”.
(2) Deportation is a forced disposition.・
2) If three persons have not been disposed of under the “Cancellation
of Status of Residence” under Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act,
They are innocent.
The fact that the Filipinos gave them a “false employment contract”
in order to obtain “residence status” was “assistance”
in the matters described in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act,
and Article 70 of the Immigration Act. It is not “support” for “illegal labor”.
The support of Article 22-4-4
of the Immigration Control Act cannot be "criminal" as "reason for crime"
For violations of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act, the “sin of support”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code is “conscious”
and “violation of applicable laws”. In other words, “False charges”.
Prosecutors still do not understand this logic.
You can understand that Japanese immigration administration is in a “rotten state”.
I ask everyone.
Please introduce an international jurist who can explain the logic
of this law to the Japanese government.
Continue to next week.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural that terrorism resolves. But crazy.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes” in Articles 60
and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
My information ******
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
******
