To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister
2019-08-28: Dear Sir,
I think you can understand that Japanese judicial administration is in a “serious state”.
I ask everyone. Japan is a trading power.
There is only the “power” of the international community to solve this.
Part 1. A complaint to the Chiba District Court in violation
of the Immigration Control Act of the Philippines.
The beginning of the complaint is omitted.
The purpose of the accusation.
According to the morning newspaper dated February 20, 2015,
the Yomiuri Shimbun and others reported that the diplomat and staff
of the Philippine Embassy were criminalized for violation of the Immigration Control Act.
The content of the article is that the driver of the Philippine embassy officials assumed
that the Philippine person in his country was hired as a domestic servant,
handed a false employment contract to the Philippine person,
and the Philippine person applied for immigration.
Acquired the status of residence for "special activities",
but instead of working as a domestic worker, he worked for a landscaping company in Tokyo.
The driver of the embassy was arrested and prosecuted in June 2014
for a criminal law “assistance offense” for violation of immigration law
(non-qualified activities).
In the trial, it became "imprisonment" with "suspended sentence" and was "Deportation".
The police confirmed the following separately from the driver based
on the story of two of the more guilty verdicts.
The Philippine people had obtained “qualification for residence” based
on documents such as employment contracts signed
in the name of “three men and women of diplomat and embassy”.
The Kanagawa Prefectural Police, in consultation with the National Police Agency,
Public Prosecutors Office, and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs,
requested an interview with the Embassy through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs,
saying that it was necessary to receive explanations
from the four people regarding the details of the contract and the actual conditions of work.
However, because they responded that they had returned home,
they decided that there was a greater possibility that they helped “illegal employment”.
The three "diplomats" who returned home immediately
after the offer made them "send the papers pertaining to a
(criminal) case to the Public Prosecutors Office" on the 6th of this month
on the suspicion of supporting the violation of the Immigration Control Act.
I think you can understand that Japanese judicial administration is in a “serious state”.
I ask everyone. Japan is a trading power.
There is only the “power” of the international community to solve this.
There are many victims in each country.
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
Yasuhiro Nagano
PS:
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."
It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/
Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
